The steam page says they've sold 500k copies now. Jesus. Game looks good and it's PvE, so.. might get it, I guess
nyctre
Everything is a CIA psyop nowadays. Everything bad happens because of the USA. Everything good happens because people are strong enough to resist US influence.
Look at Cuba. Amazing government that provides free healthcare and people are super educated. And all the issues that they have are because of the US embargo. All the other issues like freedom of speech and whatnot are not actually real, just another CIA psyop.
So see? The USA is both super powerful and super weak.
Steel panther - all I wanna do is fuck(myself tonight)
Fucking love these guys and this song especially. I don't think anything will ever top warning's watching from a distance for me in terms of doom, but these guys are pretty close.
My bad, I must've tunnel visioned on some things. But in my defense, the original argument was that he wasn't doing enough good, not that he wasn't flawed enough. And with that we're changing the subject and getting too much into subjectivity. He's not perfect, far from it.. he's paranoid, his relationships with other characters are far from good or normal because of his issues.. his handling of the joker.. etc. Could there have been more focus on his flaws and issues? Sure, but that has nothing to do with the original discussion of "why isn't he using his money to make Gotham a better place". Which he is, despite what you might say or think. Just because they're not giving us all the details that doesn't mean that he isn't. That's an artistic choice. You might disagree with that choice, but that doesn't change the canon.
If there's one line in the first issue that says "when he's not busy fighting bad guys, he spends his time investing in social programs and hires ex-convicts in his company in order to reform them and bla bla" and then never mentions it again for the next 300 issues? Then we have to assume that he's still doing that, because that's what the writer said. It's the Batman comics, not the Bruce Wayne comics.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it was a different but similar game from the same person. Even the background story was the same or similar. So.. maybe just new account
Hunter weapon
These stories are not meant to be realistic, they're not meant to be so in depth.. there's always going to be issues..
To me all that sounds like we shouldn't have heroes. Because they could all be doing other, more "efficient" jobs. Except maybe for captain planet..altho I'm sure we can find improvements for that one as well.
And yes, successful villains all end up either people that want to destroy everything or people that want to make things better but doing it wrong. Anything less than that and they're not important enough.
All these issues are usually features, not bugs, I think.
I never said he was morally good. People just like to come into batman discussions and be like "akshually, he could be spending that money on social programs to improve the city ". And the answer is that he's doing that as well.
I probably misspoke when I said that "he's doing everything that he can". Maybe he's just flawed. I dunno, it's just a comic book character. Feels pointless to overanalyze him like this. Next issue they could easily write an explanation for why the curse can't be lifted(or maybe there is one, idk). Or they could say how he's running out of money because he's spending so much on social projects. But that wouldn't really make for a great batman comic, imo. In the end, taking any fictional character so seriously is pointless imo because the answer is always the same on my mind: they did something or are a certain way because the writer thought that would be cool or be an interesting story.
I feel like I've read this comment like 3 times in 3 different batman threads this past week.. luckily all the others were down voted as they should be. He actually does do that
The issue is that Gotham is cursed so it can't be fixed, no matter how much he tries.
It's illegal to drive in slippers in certain countries, afaik. Slippers can.. um.. slip? Or whatever, they don't offer the same amount of control, that's for sure. Irrelevant 99.9% of the time, but for that 0.01%..
You do realize that it's mainly the poor people who are suffering when the rich don't get taxed, right? It's the governments getting robbed, yes, but that wasn't the main takeaway from that comment.