osarusan

joined 2 years ago
[–] osarusan@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yes. Because you're a clown if you think Trump would be better.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social -5 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I hear you man.

But still, if it goes on for 50 more years, would it ever be better to choose to eat a horse's shit over stale lima beans? Of course not.

We need to change the menu. But that's a different problem.

The question of whether to pick lima beans or horse shit is an easy one, and one that nobody should find controversial. And you should not feel bad for making the right decision there. Remember, your kids and neighbors have to eat whatever meal you choose too.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (18 children)

I think I still need to vote for him because of Republicans, but my God it will be hard to live with myself after I do.

Don't be hard on yourself for making the correct decision.

If someone tells you that you have swallow stale lima beans or horse shit and you pick the stale lima beans in hopes that you never have to do it again... well it sucks but those were the choices. If 4 years later you have to do the same thing again... well you do it, because eating stale lima beans is always going to be better than eating horse shit, and you're going to have to eat one of them.

You don't have to feel like the lima beans are your choice, your preference, or your fault or responsibility. They were one of two choices available, and you made the right one.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

So it's not alarmist then. It's an accurate take.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

See, I might have cared about OP's post being hypocritical or condescending. But then you went and posted something so outrageously dishonest, and when it was pointed out instead of owning up to your mistake and trying to do better, you doubled down on it and got pissy. But since you don't care, I guess that's where we end it.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Look at the text you wrote, and the parts that I bolded.

There is a difference between legitimate disagreement and dishonesty.

Pretending that OP is giving carte blanche to genocide or shrugging that off is an outright lie. Accusing them of anything else based on that lie is also dishonest.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You didn't answer the question though.

Do you think democracy in the US is the same today as it was 8 years ago?

And do you think that if Trump wins the election, democracy in the US will be the same 4 years from now as it is today?

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No it wasn't, not even in the least. It's absolutely dishonest to pretend that's what it was.

Go after him for what he actually said instead of making up things to be angry about.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

You thinking you have the more enlightened position simply because you are willing to carte blanche accept this behavior or foreign policy position from the candidate that will be better for the United States doesn’t make you a genius, it makes you self-rigtheous and self-centered. Real innocent people are really dying, and your ability to shrug that off in such a smug, self-satisfied way is truly appalling.

This really isn't at all what he said, and is an extremely dishonest thing to post.

You complain that your comments fall on deaf ears, but when you accuse people of things that are blatant lies, what do you expect?

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Is it alarmist though? Do you think that if Trump wins the election, democracy in the US will be the same 4 years from now as it is today?

view more: ‹ prev next ›