parody

joined 10 months ago
[–] parody 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah @xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com the guy (pedophile enabler? Can’t remember when he started) refused all this gaudy shit, kept some jank car, wouldn’t sit in the gold chair… I think, I’m remembering correctly? Carried his own bags maybe too

PS pedophilia enablement is bad, just was impressed he seemed to suck less than he had an option to

[–] parody 0 points 22 hours ago

Thx for the superior one

Those media bias folks hate all sources so whichever you link to someone else is gonna hate on (for good reason perhaps!)—but 2 is better than 1 :)

[–] parody 2 points 1 day ago

Marketing works


Very interesting, your comment! Thanks

[–] parody 2 points 2 days ago

Of course it doesn’t necessarily bring wisdom, agreed,

Also agree with considering life experience though

[–] parody 7 points 2 days ago

Don’t know the artist besides what hits the front page here

Isn’t it kind of fucking awesome that douchebags are getting owned?

[–] parody 1 points 2 days ago

Wow how did I never realize this?

Oh no: copyright. A topic Lemmy totally respects outside this context.

[–] parody 1 points 2 days ago (5 children)

No way!

Was the cheat focused on the rest of the fleet (larger cars?), but applied to all [JIC]? 🤔


50+ wao

[–] parody 9 points 2 days ago

lmao he called those ppl peasants while looking over his chubby chipmunk cheeks thru his lil plastic-surgery(?) girlie eyes

(Do u have feminine eyes & large cheeks, u cool noworry)

[–] parody 2 points 2 days ago

bona fide gooooober! Plastered Pete, always up to something a little devious!

[–] parody 3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

That emissions cheating soured me on them

(Though I do believe they used a clever method)

Glad it’s so good!

[–] parody 1 points 3 days ago

So you just request the same service you alwaysss do the morning after at the Hilton, after having had called ahead to explain your reason for booking

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmings.world/post/24420722

Disabled man gifted custom software built with ChatGPT - how could the anti-AI cohort reckon with this not-quite-inverse Robinhood kind of scheme? (corp steals from world, man uses for good)

(corp steals from world, man uses theft to help brother communicate)

Wanted to ask on /c/fuck_ai but didn’t want to get banned or ruffle feathers and miss a good discussion

Replies are welcome regardless of whether anyone personally finds the “theft“ premise preposterous - probably most useful as a thought experiment here, to pretend you & I are arguing against someone who has always been anti-AI

 

(corp steals from world, man uses theft to help brother communicate)

Wanted to ask on /c/fuck_ai but didn’t want to get banned or ruffle feathers and miss a good discussion

Replies are welcome regardless of whether anyone personally finds the “theft“ premise preposterous - probably most useful as a thought experiment here, to pretend you & I are arguing against someone who has always been anti-AI

 
bsky dot app/profile/barackobama.bsky.social/post/3lmt6gprjik2z

(corporate social media link)
 

Automated Summary (Subject To Error)

• President Trump has launched an organized "retribution campaign" against elite American institutions since November 2024, with most targets quickly capitulating

• Major law firms made deals with Trump:

  • Paul, Weiss pledged $40M in pro bono services to Trump-supported causes
  • Skadden Arps promised $100M in free legal work before Trump took action
  • Some firms (Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block) chose to fight in court

• Media organizations have settled or adjusted:

  • ABC News settled a defamation lawsuit for $15M toward Trump's presidential library
  • CBS News appears poised to settle for millions
  • Washington Post and LA Times adjusted editorial content to please the White House

• Universities have complied with demands:

  • Columbia University agreed to nine policy changes to unfreeze $400M in federal funding
  • Many hired Republican lobbyists to maintain good relations with the administration

• Key reasons for compliance include:

  • Financial self-preservation and desire to return to business as usual
  • Extensive financial entanglements between private institutions and federal government
  • Wealthy institutions paradoxically more vulnerable due to multiple pressure points
  • Limited collective resistance as "everybody's looking out for number one"
 

OK, so Apple isn't big on responding to feedback:

Nickkk's numbers eclipse mine: I'm 0/10 on responses/acknowledgments/signs of life over the past couple of years. And you know what...

That's OK. They're telling us they're too big for that. OK.

Accepting this fact, how can Apple avoid hurting their fanboys' little feelings, like through better transparency setting expectations? Could we get some recognition, some social features, automated acknowledgments, a "thanks, archiving" email after 18mo w/o response for a sense of closure... anything?


vWill I do free labor if it fixes annoying bugs in products I use myself, yes.

Will I continue shouting into the void, well even I've gotta put my foot down somewhere.


PS: to open the feedback tool, launch this URL (e.g. via Open URL in Shortcuts):

applefeedback://

 

& Kagi (search company w/controversial CEO) sounds like they're doing something right

Excerpt:

...Paul Kafasis...took it and pursued it thoroughly, asking Siri “Who won Super Bowl __?” for every number from 1 through 60.

His report at One Foot Tsunami documenting the results is utterly damning:

So, how did Siri do? With the absolute most charitable interpretation, Siri correctly provided the winner of just 20 of the 58 Super Bowls that have been played. That’s an absolutely abysmal 34% completion percentage. If Siri were a quarterback, it would be drummed out of the NFL.

Siri did once manage to get four years in a row correct (Super Bowls IX through XII), but only if we give it credit for providing the right answer for the wrong reason. More realistically, it thrice correctly answered three in a row (Super Bowls V through VII, XXXV through XXVII, and LVII through LIX). At its worst, it got an amazing 15 in a row wrong (Super Bowls XVII through XXXII). Most amusingly, it credited the Philadelphia Eagles with an astonishing 33 Super Bowl wins they haven’t earned, to go with the 1 they have.

Below, I’ve gathered a dozen of my favorite responses, in sequential order.

 

Courtesy (mostly) XCancel dot com:

 

Hey folks,

Made a post yesterday on !politics@lemmy.world

Here it is on our instance: https://lemmings.world/post/21083652

It shows up whether I'm logged in or not, but I was surprised to see it at +1 after a day - so I checked !politics@lemmy.world , and it's missing from the New queue where I would expect to see it based on its position as seen on: https://lemmings.world/c/politics@lemmy.world

Thank you very much folks!

💭Wonder how often this has happened to various Lemmings over the years... hopefully most folks know to try again somehow and don't think they're ignored! 🙂

 

Arizona Attorney General Chris Mayes strongly criticized the Trump administration this past Tuesday, describing its actions as dictatorial, authoritarian, and making a mockery of law and the Constitution.

A.G. Mayes spoke to the importance of checks and balances and the danger of ignoring established law. Mayes alleges Trump has transferred Congress's power to the unelected billionaire, Musk.

Mayes urges all Americans to stand up, speak out, and defend our democratic processes.

Edit: added thumbnail

 

President Musk (summarized):

  • we were wrong
  • it's OK we were wrong because... well, NBD anyway
  • Americans ❤️ HIV -> Dead Africans

Transcript / Story below:

Musk questions value of US funding for HIV programmes in Mozambique

"Trump boasted last month that his administration had stopped $50m of “bomb-making” condoms being sent to the Palestinian enclave of Gaza, as part of a wider campaign led by billionaire Elon Musk to cut waste and fraud from federally funded programmes.

Trump provided no evidence for his claims, which caused widespread confusion. It later emerged that the recipients of the contraceptives may be a province in Mozambique sharing the same name, where USAID funds large-scale HIV prevention programmes.

Speaking to reporters at the White House on Tuesday, Musk was asked whether he would correct his previous statements. Here is what he said in response:

“Well, first of all, some of the things that I say will be incorrect and should be corrected. So nobody’s going to bat a thousand. We will make mistakes, but we’ll act quickly to correct any mistakes,” he said.

“I’m not sure we should be sending $50m worth of condoms to anywhere, frankly. I’m not sure that’s something Americans would be really excited about. That is really an enormous number of condoms, if you think about it. If it went to Mozambique instead of Gaza, I’m like, ‘Okay, that’s not as bad, but still, why are we doing that?’” Musk continued."

view more: next ›