Question: I thought to 'transpire' could mean 'shedding moisture' and/or 'things that happened or are revealed'

English is not my first language though so there's that

Ok, so if both of these hypothetical parties fully and completely, without reservation, support the invasion (or let's call it what it is, war) then there is not a lot you can do.

But it turns out one party has no problems with that invasion/war and supports it. Heck, they even tell others who protest the invasion to just accept it all as a fact and just deal and live with it. Also calls to surrender parts of your land because the leader of the invasion is having a certain 'grip' on the party leader.

The other party is lacking in action to change this outcome but has shown signs that they do not like the invasion but need to get/stay in power to try and stop the madness. But to get elected they cannot come out and say "we will stop the invasion" because that is a death-knell to their goal to be elected and in power.

As you see or can probably understand, you are not dealing with parties per-se, you are dealing with the populace who get to vote for either party. Navigating that populace to get elected is a tricky and a risky thing, before you know it you blew you chances and the other party wins.

This is truly the case of voting for the party who has some semblance of being able to do the right thing, even if it is late or voting for the party who has clearly signaled to be 100% against what you hope and stand for.

Best bet in this case is to vote for hope and possibility, not the surefire way the other party wants to dig a much, much deeper hole which will be infinitely more difficult to crawl out of.

There is no easy solution, only thing we have is choosing the ones who show a flicker of hope in doing better. Good luck!

Good point on the need to keep delivering, that can be a challenge. However, if your opponent/target is a clown like trump you have a near infinite source to keep your motor running. So the validity of the argument hinges on who you face off with.

I mean, who doesn't smear poop on the walls of the capitol? Lovely guy this shaman fellow, a poop artist really...

"I love how I can be called every single name in the book on Lemmy and Reddit for having a different opinion"
Yes, everybody else is crazy and wrong, not you. Absolutely do not question your stance if everybody opposes you, just double down on crying about it and call it not fair.

"funny how ultra Liberal these sites have become..."
I call BS on this one, you always found these sites unsavory and liberal, you just made an account on those sites to 'push back' on these liberals. You are probably on some form of mission, either coordinated or personal, I don't know, but you sure do sound like a troll.

Now don't take this as 'mean librul hurst my feelies', these are just my opinion after assessing you to be an a-hole.

Men zal zich op tijd moeten verwittigen van den verstreken tijd, opdat den eigenaar van den automobiel deze kan verplaatsen naar den juiste plek. In menig huishouden zal men moeders de vrouw aankijken voor het tijdig afgeven enig signaal aan haar man, den rechtmatige en eenige bestuurder des automobiels, aangezien moeders vaak in den hectiek van het gezinsleven wat vaker opmerkzaam zal zijn van den verstreken tijd. Mocht men zich toch vergissen of op eenig andere wijze den tijd uit het oog verloren zijn en niet den automobiel verplaatsen, dan zal den diender van dienst U op eenig opportuun moment aanspreken op uw mogelijk strafbaar gedrag. Deze berisping kan U op een boete komen te staan op den royaale som van ƒ1,50! Beter is het om dezes ellende te voorkomen en moeders eene lichte corrigeeerende tik te verkoopen omdat zij blijkbaar in het alarmeren van manlief danig heeft verzaakt! Houzee!

Why do you keep using the word ‘hate’ so much? If I distrust someone because the thing they believe is not rooted in reality, you label it as hate.

In facts I would say that your disdain and vigor to label someone with ‘hate’ is pointing to your own hate towards others.

And the fact that humans have felt a need to create religion upon religion is perhaps because of the lack of understanding the world and nature around them. Fear of death is a huge driver to create an afterlife and death affects all of mankind, so it is logical to see it create religion on all levels over the planet.

I find your attitude towards people who air their opinion rather toxic tbh.

Exactly. I read that boring text, created at great speed during inflationary circumstances but great economic potential for external stakeholders, and it could be about anything. It’s a typical investors gobbledygook BS that bores the crap out of me. This is not about F1 or racing, it’s meant for ‘economic external partners’ or whatever.

We knew this would come once an American investment party would take over.

Would you like:

• The F1 starters pack - what is F1
• The F1 starters pack - al current drivers and their tempers
• The F1 starters pack - the Yuki edition
• The F1 starters pack - the Lewis edition
• The F1 starters pack - a history of moaning from drivers throughout history

If you a fast decider we will throw in a nice booklet called “what to do when another team than the one you support is dominating; The Deal With It special”

It's pining for the Fjords.

No problem here, you on the other hand, defending dug abusers in the WH, tssk ssk tssk.

Yes, lets give Meta and Zuck te benefit of the doubt.

Block all Meta and commercial access or you will be part of a product.