[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 weeks ago

Narrator - "it wasnt"

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

It's actually an instance of super small government. Those regulations are dictated by city's and counties not by states

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

This man exploded 3 seconds later, those are gas lines

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, also Samsung made it work in the S active phones, and Nokia has started carrying the torch with their XR line. That's Def not the reason for them being removed.

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This chaps my ass almost as much as the beefy 5 layer burrito

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 71 points 2 months ago

That price held untill atleast 2012, that's a solid 5 dollars of increase in just over 10 years. I could totally be talking out my ass

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Chin cramp gang rise up. U remain the unicorn of the armpit cramp, that sounds agonizing, sorry for ur loss.

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

It is an anicdote that is in direct contrast to the OP message

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

I agree, most of the problem is people putting rental civics where they shouldnt be. A subie with a lift is enough to get u through mosy of national park 4w only roads. It's usually driver error that gets u stuck. Garuntee most people they pull out never had any kind of gear to get themselves out.

That said, it Def helps to roll with some one who does have 4w incase u get a little head strong.

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

It's honestly more of a clearence issue, but either way it is most definitely a driver issue. If u aren't skilled it doesn't matter what ur driving, I've seen idiots in rental Jeeps with foot plus clearence high center on obstacles that aren't really that challenging

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago

I originally had a reactionary response to this... Like why should the burden be on Architects. Most of us would love to make a building as efficent as possible, but at the end of the day it all comes down to who's paying. Sometimes no matter how much u try to educate a client they don't care and will barely be swayed with "it's not to code" as a reason. There's sooo many people above us with more power pulling levers and making decisions and we're lucky some times to push a client in the direction of more sustainable (and expensive) windows that are above code minimums.

Then I read the article, and after pulling my head out of my own ass where I was apparently throwing myself a putty party, I came out agreeing with the author. Although we do not usually hold much leverage, even with organizations like AIA and Ncarb, we do have a unique position of understanding the complexities of how things go from being design to built should use that knowledge to help inform and guide movements for the betterment of the environment. For example, even if IEEC insulation regulations go up, it is up the the individual municipality to accept them, same with all building codes, and I can tell u there is Wide variation depending on how liberal the municipality is and this can be just from county to county.

So while I want to blame everyone else that is responsible for allowing the wrong codes from being rattified or rich developer for skimping on windows and insulation(still legal cause energy codes) in a high rise, it's on architects to educate and try to push the system from the bottom.

[-] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

Thought this man was rolling a joint at first glance.

view more: next ›

terry_jerry

joined 1 year ago