Probably because their offspring survive better in the freshwater streams than the ocean that they'll live in later in life.

Damn imagine paying to read an article to confirm your biases. If you're going to claim something is a bubble you need to claim something more specific than "AI".

The entire early modern web was a bubble in the early 00s and it's still here. There's not even many large companies yet to even start being bubbly. An actual AI bubble could be 10 years off.

I just love how so many educated and intelligent people can get stuck in knee jerk reactionary takes because some admittedly large aspects of a new technology (LLMs) are annoying as hell.

About 24 states have some form of open primary. Most of them are entirely open. Some are independents/uncommited-only as you noted.

The dems haven't had a supermajority trifecta in over a decade and even that was just a few months and included a few independents. They passed massive legislation in this short time too. So it's time to get over it and learn how our government has worked at every other moment in time.

Brilliant deduction. I'm sure you're very smart. One day you might learn that being smart and being correct are not mutually inclusive.

To add some more realism to these numbers:

• Age is not evenly distributed at all.
• A variety of your other factors likely have significant overlap with each other.
• 1% mutual interest after already matching on many crucial factors is also exceptionally pessimistic estimating.

Nahh that's misandrist and body shaming. This definition is better.

Fatalities are one thing to consider. Another is injuries that can range from minor to life changing.

I don't know the stats on this but pedestrian injuries would be something for policy makers to consider as well.

And in general:

• If deaths are up it's safe to assume injuries are up as well
• Good policy making also involves preventing problems, and educating people on the issue. If 0.2% of deaths is acceptable and trending up at what point do we take action? 0.5%? 1%? 5%?

I don't think that the US even tracks injuries at least I can't find anything from a cursory search. But according to Vancouver RTOR is 13% of all deaths and serious injuries. https://viewpointvancouver.ca/2022/08/23/rethinking-the-right-turn-on-red/

Ohh please. They're building 1,100 units of housing for students and 125 unit for the homeless while preserving the park for community use.

These "Save XYZ" people are always the same. They want nothing to change and they consider housing to be displacement.

They're regressivism/conservatism/urban sprawl disguised as progressive action. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Students need housing. The homeless need housing. This is land that UC owns and can use for this. It's expensive enough to build housing as it is.

https://archive.is/zEQLZ

Trying to redefine antisemitism while being antisemitic yourself isn't going to fly well.

"Jews get a word because of all their propaganda" is like basic, run of the mill antisemitism.

no

Plot twist: the senior dev is the one who copy and pasted it after the junior dev's code didn't work