[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 45 points 4 months ago

Only 15% 🤨

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 47 points 5 months ago

It’s sad how consumers have zero rights when it comes to digital content. Companies can retroactively make changes, removing content legitimately bought by consumers with no repercussions. I get “not owning” but for a company to collect money for services provided and not actually provide those services will never not astound me.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 46 points 5 months ago

“I’m sorry ma'am but could you please remove your jacket from the seat? It’s obstructing the ads and we have a very clear policy about that”

🙃

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 46 points 5 months ago

Sometimes I take spellcheck for granite.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Right! Google acting like they are losing billions a month due to adblockers when in reality it’s like .2% of their total profits and they STILL foaming at the mouth.

🖕

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s why no one outside Google wants it. Apple said no. Firefox said no. There’s a reason. WebRTC is shit. It leaks too much just for a small convenience.

And yeah, browsers don’t need my USB ports thanks.

This move was what hurt VIA as they moved to the API exclusively. So the only native apps are just electron wrappers 🤷‍♂️

Edit: Looks like Mozilla said yes after all heavy sigh: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebUSB_API

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago

Why? It’s not guns and bullets killing people, it’s 3D printing 🙃

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago

Casually mention that you’d no longer want to be referred to as “he/him but them/they” and watch the arteries burst lol

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 year ago

This is not good. I don’t get how people still have good faith in big business. Here’s what’s going to happen, we will be moving towards a pay for service WITH ads. And data mining.

It’s not one or the other here. People somehow think it’s either a) “pay for the service” OR b) “have your personal data raped and parcelled out to the highest bidder.” It’s not. It’s not either a or b, it’s either b or a AND b.

So I have to pay to be tracked?

And you know once everyone acclimates to the new pricing, it’s going to be “hey we are adding a new plan for $9 that has ads and all the telemetry. Oh, we are also raising the rates.”

The real problem is the entire company is rotten. I don’t understand why people think a pay wall won’t make that the case.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago

The bar is so low. I remember my old roommates from Uni. If there was any disagreement about a thing, they’d whip out their phone, find any article that remotely supports their claim and that was it. You’re wrong. A case in point was using reg dishwashing soap in a dishwasher (I told them all not to). They couldn’t really find anything on Google so they just said it was fine.

The future looks as bright as mud.

Fact checking. Never heard of it.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago

Apple knew it too. Even without pressure from the EU’s upcoming laws around USBC, they knew we would all riot if they clung to Lightning. iPads, Macs, have all moved on.

Just. USBC all the things. Let me die in a world with one fucking cable. Please. Can we at least do that as a society?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ultratiem

joined 1 year ago