Also there isn’t a concrete plan
The motto of the UCP
Also there isn’t a concrete plan
The motto of the UCP
Youtube would rather be able to track every user and make more profit per person than go big tent all audiences.
True, but consider that Google, Alphabet, whatever, is fundamentally an information broker. All of their services and technologies are simply a means to that end. They have no incentive to go big tent if it means sacrificing their ability to harvest data on individuals and groups.
I'm not saying TrueNAS and ZFS aren't good. For large enterprise systems, arrays with sufficient redundancy, servers with reliable power management, I can see its advantages, esp. w/ snapshots, etc. I acknowledge that Open Media Vault is mickey mouse in comparison.
I just feel compelled to share my experience when I see people considering TrueNAS for their first foray into building a small home media server, running a z1 array, with no mention of battery backup or power management. ZFS isn't inherently safer. It's safer when paired with sufficient redundancy and power management.
When I built my first server, TrueNAS, ZFS, and Raid z1 made perfect sense. And I loved it for the first couple months. Then an update and unexpected shutdown rendered my storage pools unrecoverable. Had backups for most but not all of the files, and spent almost a year of bits of free time here wading in way over my head on highly technical support forum threads & there trying to bring the pools back online. Nothing worked, the array was toast.
I don't know how tech savvy you are, but here's the advice I'd give my past self - Take a few weeks to read documentation and play with TrueNAS before filling up your drives with stuff. Peek around in troubleshooting forums, see if the troubleshooting you may have to do is in line with your experience level.
After wiping my drives and starting over, I built around Open Media Vault. It's less pretty and less feature rich than TrueNas, but it's also much less fragile in a raid z1 setup and I never worry about it.
Always worth taking a peek at a user's home instance. Some are pushing out more ragebait than others.
Owens' thinking is so deeply sophistical, and this topic is so niche. I just can't imagine the mindset of someone who would be even marginally interested in her 8 part documentary on the sexuality of Emmanuel Macron's wife. Why does anyone on earth care about this?
I have a theory about her intentions for writing about killing that dog.
Noem published her autobiography while vying to be the republican running mate in the election. On the one hand, why would she choose to publish something so openly sinister in her autobiography, at such a consequential time for her political career? She must have known that story would get picked up and blasted in the media. But part of me wonders if maybe, that was her goal. Maybe by including the dog story in her book, Noem was sending a signal to Trump that she wouldn't flinch to do the cruel, dirty work that maga wants done. And now here she is, doing dirty work.
Hey, thanks for sharing, really enjoyed that!
Out of curiosity, in a perfect world and existing regulations excepted, what sort of firearm regulations would you like to see in Canada?
I know we live in a polarized political landscape. And I acknowledge it's not possible to make everyone happy. But I also feel like, part of being a good politician is conducting yourself in such a way that large numbers of people don't hate you. Poilievre failed at that, so I think it's fair and proper that he's on the receiving end of this political bullying.
And it's comical that a man so gripped by antagonistic, indecent rhetoric is getting all huffy that citizens are making a mockery of his cowardly and stupid by-election. Obviously, instead of protesting, he should be asking himself why so many citizens are willing to dedicate their free time to fucking with his shit.
What's going on with that front headlight? It looks cool.