[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

To clarify, Lidia claimed that both the racist no campaign and the yes campaign drowned out the progressive no campaign.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

Lidia Thorpe has also believed before the vote that a No vote would prove Australia is racist, just as a yes vote would prove Australia is racist. Given that, I think Lidia would agree with the author here.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

Admittedly this is where the meme kind of breaks down.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 34 points 1 month ago

I forgot about that, oops.

326
Linux is Popular (pawb.social)

Repost of a meme I made a few years ago for Reddit that I have since deleted. Hope it still has value.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago

I hear timezone names can also be a slight issue at times, some Australians call the eastern time zone EST. Leap years aren't so bad at times either though. Kind of agree with the rest of it, much of the complexity is from historical dates.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"OpenBSD made a secure fork of X?" Depends on what you consider secure I guess. X has some fundamental design issues.

One particularly memorable one is that lock screens in X are run on top of your userspace. If they crash, you get to use your computer again. No matter how many patches are applied to X lock screens, a new bug appears every few years that has to be patched. It fails insecurely, and as such will always be insecure as long as the lock screen could feasibly crash.

If your answer is "lock screens don't matter," security is not a top priority for you, and that's okay. There are other reasons you may wish to use X. Please understand however that some people may find it important, and may choose to use Wayland as a result.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 4 points 5 months ago

I can't remember which, but some applications just show as the xorg icon when running under xorg.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I quite like many games with "poor" graphics. Perhaps not exclusively, but you're seriously missing out if you only go for realistic-looking or detailed games. Give a few of those indie games a try, you might be surprised.

Edit: Oh, and terminal games are cool! Usually not very performant though.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 7 points 5 months ago

They've been working on GIMP 3.0 for over a decade, which has non-destructive editing, as well as an upgrade to the UI toolkit (although actual UI changes are still to-do). They don't want it to be this way, development has just been insanely slow. Mostly due to lack of developers and donations, although that has been changing recently.

They planned to have GIMP 3.0 out by May, but with so many delays it might be a few months yet.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 9 points 6 months ago

I think that's more what the people excited about AI think it it is, many of the people who fear it don't really fear its intelligence as much as how it's abused. Personally, I don't even like the machine learning algorithms in social media, despite them being a thing for a long time now.

[-] yistdaj@pawb.social 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

From what I understand, GIMP fell behind because it refused corporate donations while Krita accepted them. This lead to GIMP reducing in scope as the 1-3 part-time* developers (at least when I last really looked into it) realised they'd never catch up, leading to people donating less as they weren't satisfied with GIMP's simultaneous underpromising and underdelivering. Meanwhile Krita managed to receive enough money to hire a team of full time developers for several years, leading to better software, to more donations. It's like the poverty trap, but with software.

  • Edit: part-time isn't the right word, more like casual
view more: next ›

yistdaj

joined 1 year ago