64
submitted 1 month ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

SAO PAULO (AP) — Venezuela’s opposition was dealt a blow Thursday when countries that had been pressuring President Nicolás Maduro to release vote tallies backing his claim to victory in last month’s presidential election began suggesting a repeat of the contest instead.

The proposal from the leftist governments of Brazil and Colombia, both Maduro allies, came less than three weeks after the results of the highly anticipated election came into question when the main opposition coalition revealed it has proof that its candidate defeated the president by a more than 2-to-1 margin.

The opposition categorically rejected any plan to redo the election.

Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, during a virtual news conference with Argentine media, said that repeating the July 28 presidential election would be “an insult” to the people, and she asked if a second election were held and Maduro still didn’t accept the results, “do we go for a third one?”

In Washington, U.S. President Joe Biden expressed support for new elections in comments to reporters that the White House later appeared to back away from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Or you remove all pretense he has and his support either evaporates or is forced to publicly renounce democracy.

As you said

It’s not like Maduro is going to give up power either way.

So what does that matter? "Oh, he has no support now though!" So? People like you will still be wringing your hands and crying "B-b-but what if there's a civil war??? We can't provoke him! Living in a fascist state is better than that, because it's MY kind of fascist, and fuck what the Venezuelan people think!"

But I bet you don’t really care about that, you’ve already got a preference for which nation leads the invasion, huh?

Yeah, Brazil. But I guess that's not as convenient a boogeyman as the US for justifying your favored fascists.

The US has enough foreign affairs to be handling at the moment. If there is going to be outside intervention, the Venezuelan people must take up arms in defense of their own rights first; and then that outside support should come from the region, not from a distant superpower.

Any other fascist apologia you wanna engage in?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 1 month ago

Brazil agrees they should to do another election... Kind of the point of the article.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

And if they do another election and Maduro still refuses to concede, you'll still be sitting here saying

Would you prefer a civil war or an invasion to fix it then?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 1 month ago

No, I'd say "guess you guys need to do a civil war then"

But that's their business. Not America's, and not even Brazil's.

It's called self determination, maybe you've heard of it?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, I’d say “guess you guys need to do a civil war then”

Oh, so stealing one election is fine, but two is just a bit too much for you? What's the calculus on this for how many elections have to be blatantly stolen before it's permissible to oppose the government?

But that’s their business. Not America’s, and not even Brazil’s.

Just enough of their business that you're interested in supporting a second election after the Venezuelan people have already spoken. What a conveniently placed arbitrary line you've drawn.

It’s called self determination, maybe you’ve heard of it?

"Self-determination is when you choose to support an authoritarian regime and oppose support to the democratically elected opposition, and the more you support the authoritarian regime, the more self-determined it is."

Alternatively, "Self-determination is when you tell a voting population that their vote doesn't count and they have to redo it until their authoritarian government decides to tell the truth about the outcome; it'll happen someday, promise!"

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago

Lol, not invading other countries is supporting authoritarianism?

According to the guy who knows better than all of Venezuela's neighbors, mind you.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lol, not invading other countries is supporting authoritarianism?

Saying "Wh-what do you want to happen, a civil war??? Better to just let Maduro hold onto power, he's not going to give it up anyway 🥺" is supporting authoritarianism. It is, in fact, downright fascist apologia to try to suppress the voice of a people who have spoken out in favor of change in their government and instead insist on letting the jingoistic ultranationalist government sending dissenters to prison camps to stay in power for as long as it wants.

But I'm sure you know that. That's why you're saying it, after all.

Maybe on the sixth or seventh stolen election, they'll get Maduro to give up. They just need to vote harder, right?

According to the guy who knows better than all of Venezuela’s neighbors, mind you.

Oh yes, Venezuela's neighbors, well-known for recognizing Maduro's re-election

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Brazil and Columbia, literally in this article: Do another election with more oversight

Lemming Expert: NOOO WAR IS THE ONLY WAY TO FORCE MADURO OUT >:(

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Another election happens. More oversight. Maduro still says "No, we won". You still say "W-what do you want to do about it??? WAR??? Wouldn't it be so much better if Venezuelans just rolled over and let the fascists stomp all over them? 🥺"

Like, did you forget that there was oversight for this election too? But anything to lick fascist boots, I guess.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

"Use the international pressure to force them to accept stronger oversight and more secure measures"

"Reeeeee what good will that do I want BLOOD and a FOREIGN REGIME CHANGE"

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Use the international pressure to force them to accept stronger oversight and more secure measures”

Again, what does that matter? There was oversight this time. It didn't matter, because the government just said "No, we won." No matter how badly they lose, ultimately, without enforcement mechanisms, from the Venezuelan people or from external support, there is no way to enforce the results of an election. But you know that, of course. You only advocate for people to "Vote harder" when you know it'll do nothing.

My favorite part is where you said it's none of any outside country's business, and now you're arguing the complete opposite; that there should be international pressure to force the issue in Venezuela. 10/10 consistency. Anything to bootlick for fascism, I guess.

Like, you fucking started this conversation saying that Maduro wouldn't give up power even if there was a second election, which pretty nakedly gives up the game when you're arguing that there should be a second election and that violence is unacceptable for the opposition to use.

“Reeeeee what good will that do I want BLOOD and a FOREIGN REGIME CHANGE”

Ah, yes, much different than "Blood and no regime change", but I guess protesters getting gunned down in the streets and shipped off to labor camps is just wholesome left praxis to you, huh? The proles have to turn the other cheek, but the fascist regime gets to kill whoever it wants to.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

?

Israel kills more people every day than Maduro's regime has since the election. I don't see you arguing for an invasion of Israel...

I wonder what the difference is to you. Since you're such a strong anti-fascist, you'd think you'd be more concerned about an active genocide than an internal struggle where, apparently, nothing but boots on the ground will suffice.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Israel kills more people every day than Maduro’s regime has since the election. I don’t see you arguing for an invasion of Israel…

I have openly said previously that I would be in favor of literal war with Israel. So, you know, maybe it's just you that simps for fascist regimes because they're led by 'the right people'.

I wonder what the difference is to you. Since you’re such a strong anti-fascist, you’d think you’d be more concerned about an active genocide than an internal struggle where, apparently, nothing but boots on the ground will suffice.

lmao, keep making up strawmen to attack.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
64 points (93.2% liked)

World News

38573 readers
3778 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS