400
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump fired off an angry middle-of-the-night attack on “highly overrated Jewish Governor” Josh Shapiro after he spoke out against the former president at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday night.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 189 points 4 months ago

Ah yes the strategy of trying to court jewish Americans by *checks notes* being blatantly antisemitic. There's no real reason to mention he's Jewish here other than to be antisemitic and imply he's a "bad jew"

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 58 points 4 months ago

At this point there is no chance of "court(ing)" enough voters to win. MAYBE when all anyone knew of Biden was a guy who chugged a bottle of nyquil before a debate for some reason but even america isn't stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

If trump wins it will be because of decades of gerrymandering and outright election theft through court cases, bad faith electors, and violence.

And shit like this? This is the threat. Explain that anyone who breaks ranks is going to be just as much of a target as pence was.

Hell, I wouldn't be shocked if we have a "Jan 6 was a day of patriotism" ad before this 70-something days is up.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 82 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

but even america isn't stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

I'm afraid you're vastly underestimating the stupidity of Americans. I just hope enough people vote.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

They're stupid enough when it comes to not voting at all. If everyone showed up and voted for who they prefer, no Republican would ever be president again (unless they pivot away from being the Fascist Party).

[-] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

And yet, "did not vote" would have won something like 80% of the last 100 years of elections.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 months ago

One thing there that shouldn't be discounted is how hard it was for folks working multiple jobs, who have to take care of their kids, etc to be able to get to a voting booth.

Long lines, inaccessible mail in voting, and so on have long been issues especially for the lower income bracket where they aren't getting the option to work from home that day, or live in an area where there are so many booths that the line takes 10 minutes to get through.

So I wouldn't say its all "stupid" people who don't vote. These were intentional decisions made by others trying to limit access to voting, and in the past, it worked. The moment mail in voting became ubiquitous, there was a massive increase in voters.

Pushing for keeping options open for everyone to vote, including making it a federal holiday, consistently available mail in voting, ensuring access to sufficient booths, etc, is of utmost importance.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It's a shame that in a supposed "free country" that all voting is not done like it's done here in Colorado.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That sounds pretrlty inline with what they said.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Agreed. PT Barnum was a very wealthy man.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 28 points 4 months ago

My parents seem like normal somewhat rational people. They are still planning to vote for Trump. Please stop with this "we've already won" shit. It can only cost us the win. Go vote. It's far from guaranteed. It honestly looks to be pretty close to an even race right now.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Please stop with this “we’ve already won” shit.

That's not at all the right takeaway from his comment. The right takeaway from his comment is that Trump has every intention of winning by massively cheating, and his supporters are already inserting themselves into positions within the election system to do just that.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
  1. Your parents are not "somewhat rational people" if they are voting for a hateful bigot and rapist who is openly compromised by foreign powers and openly talking about how people only have to vote "one more time"
  2. Please read posts before responding to them
  3. We have popular republicans speaking at the DNC and getting cheered. There was a LOT of stupidity about Biden ("He is anti-Palestine so we should let trump win instead!") but he is gone and there is no time to make a proper attack against Kamala. trump is not going to sway additional voters and is already losing "moderates" who are desperate for anything other than a rapist lunatic who would love Gilead if he knew how to read.

That is why the focus is on strong arming his party and elected officials to remind them that he led a literal fucking lynch mob against the last republican who crossed him by... not shitting on the constitution on Jan 6.

if trump wins it is not going to be by a popular vote (it was never going to be that). It is not even going to be by barely squeaking by on the electoral college. It is going to be by getting close and then using outright theft and violence to get the rest of the way.

Which is why, even if someone is too stupid to understand that there are down ballot candidates who matter just as much (arguably moreso), they still need to vote. Because we need a landslide so that there are no elected (or military...) officials who decide that they want to be on "the winning team" and defy the will of the people. And that is who trump is campaigning to at this point.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Almost half the country will vote for the orange ape. Don't other this guy's parents. If everyone voted the country wouldn't be in this situation anyway. Take 40% out of the voting pool (not even counting voter suppression) and the ill-informed will vote alongside the hyper-informed.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago

His parents are actively supporting a bigoted rapist who wants to destroy the country and become king.

They deserve some other-ing.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

That tribal rubbish is how we got into this bullshit in the first place. We need to reach out into their community, not declare fellow Americans outlaws.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

Yes, the real problem is the people who don't respect others right to... decide that people deserve to be persecuted for the color of their skin or what they have between their legs.

Fuck off with that. I someone is supporting a violent bigoted rapist then they SHOULD be a fucking outlaw.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

I agree that Trump is evil. But in a democracy, people are permitted to vote how they like. That the fucking point of it. If your view prevails don't complain if the other side gets in and decides to 'other' you. You have to be fine with that, because that's what you are promoting.

I don't know if you have heard the British singer, Billy Bragg? He's quite famous as a anti-Tory lefty. Great singer too. He wrote a song called 'Full English Brexit' and it was quite compassionate about trying to understand his ideological enemies . These people are being hurt by late stage capitalism. They can be uneducated, low information and bewildered. Hucksters have been taking advantage of their weaknesses for generations. Othering them will not change their mind. Reaching out is your only hope. Harris has that capacity if she gets a chance. I'm not a huggy huggy hippie, but this problem will not go away with more hate. That's been done for nine years now and the other guys are better at mindless hate than we are.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I am not talking about othering people because they have different opinions about capital gains taxes or whether the local high school should have money to rebuild their stadium.

I am talking about a rapist who led a violent insurrection and a party who actively talks about violence against his opponents. That is not democracy. That is fascism in the making.

And people are permitted to vote how they like. Someone could get out there and run on a platform of "little boy dicks are awesome". That doesn't mean they deserve to be accepted into society because they actively are not part of society at that point.

Freedom of Speech is the right to say stuff. it is not the right to not be judged for it.

And all this "we have to meet in the middle" bullshit? Again, let's do that for socioeconomic issues. There is no fucking middle for basic human rights. Unless your idea is that trans people can only breathe every other day. And women are only allowed autonomy of their body if they can get an appointment before noon?

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Your are misrepresenting my position. I am not suggesting that we "meet in the middle". I'm say that if their ideas suck, attack their ideas.

Furthermore, I understand your position and have respect for it. I was there too. We need to promote and communicate better. Harris's version will actually lift these same people, but they just don't understand that because of the GOP's and related Media's poison.

Or,just continue to go down the mindless road of hate, that seems to be working splendidly. Anyway, thanks for the discussion!

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

When someone has shitty ideas, you attack the ideas. And, more importantly, you explain how they would actually benefit from UBI or whatever.

When someone openly wants the extermination of a people because they were born the wrong gender or want to enslave women? When they are all but saying they want to rape their political opponent?

They don't count as people anymore. They are monsters and should be treated as such. Anything less is normalizing that. Which is exactly what we did with decades of "We have to show love to the neonazis so they can choose love" bullshit. We went from nazis being the universal evil that you can do any horrible thing to in media to needing to be careful to not portray them TOO negatively out of fear of death threats.

And also? Former neonazis don't talk about how Jamal Walker next door was so nice to them that they just had to reevaluate if replacement theory was maybe a bit wrong. They hit rock bottom. They are abandoned by their families and often have their faces eaten by leopards. And then they decide they want to be in society again and put in the effort to maybe stop calling for the eradication of others and so forth.

So, again, fuck off with that steven universe "We just have to all be friends and love each other". The moment someone's "political" beliefs descend into stealing basic human rights and enslaving others? They don't deserve to live in society anymore.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

That's a rational view, but not born out by past experience. Sadly, there are apparently a huge number of horrible Americans who still think Trump is exactly right.

Hillary got flak for calling Trump supporters a "basket of deplorables," but in hindsight that was a kind way of saying it.

[-] aniki 28 points 4 months ago

All the american zionist apartheid colonists will still support him, though, because he also hates the other people more.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Most American zionists aren't Jewish to begin with. They're evangelical Christians who want to ship all the Jews back to the "Holy Land" to kick-start "Armageddon" so they themselves can get "Raptured." They don't give a shit about Jews; they just want them gone.

They have more than enough privilege to support Trump's hate without any risk to themselves -- actually, even that is an understatement: they're at the very core of Trump's base.

[-] aniki 7 points 4 months ago

Nah there's a ton of "Israeli-Americans" who now live on stolen land:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism_as_settler_colonialism

[-] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

The entire population of Israel is under 10 million people. Even if every single one of them were Israeli-American (i.e. eligible to vote in US elections), they would still be dwarfed by the more than the 80 million evangelical Christians in the US who mostly support Israel (not Jews, just Israel) for the reason I described.

[-] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 8 points 4 months ago

Wait! He can't be antisemitic, his son in law is Jewish! /s

And he has on multiple occasions told Jews they have to have their head checked if they vote Democrat, instead of the group with tiki torches chanting about how 'Jews will not replace us". He is also currently on a KKK campaign stop tour which makes this land even better.

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
400 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS