355
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
355 points (94.0% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3414 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"Oh fuck I'm spoiling the wrong voters"
The fact the GOP backed him thinking he'd pull voters from Democrats shows just how out of touch the GOP has gotten
Well, if you go strictly based off his positions on paper, or as posted on his website, he hits all the "progressive" points that would seem very attractive to a progressive independent or some more left democrats. Its a legit honest mistake to think he might be fairly left, based off when I was researching him a bit.
But every time he opens his mouth in front of a camera it's the most asinine right wing brain worm vomit you've ever heard, and I think they figured that out a little too late.
I mean, apparently he was a pretty good dude and an environmentalist for a long time.
Then around the time he got a worm in his brain, he just went bat shit crazy for some weird reason...
I'm imagining Ratatouille, only it's an anthropomorphized worm steering RFK Jr around by chomping on different parts of his brain. I want to say the worm would be voiced by David Cross. It's almost making this bizarre timeline a little easier to process.
Ignore the necrotic, segmented, invertebrate behind the curtain...
Maybe, but every time he speaks it's all conspiracy theory shit: anti-vax, etc.
Yup, that's the point I made. Put some pretty stuff on paper, but it all gets ugly the second he gets in front of a mic.
Uh...no...he was very pro gun. He was liberal on like one or two issues, but most of his policies were straight up Republican.
I wanted to like the guy as a viable alternative to Biden, but he was hard right on too many issues.
Just gonna point out damned near every lefty Redneck ive met is violently pro gun, but they all would happily mutilate someone for improper use of a firearm. The NRA and Republicans aint pro gun if they were they wouldnt throw a fit everytime a minority used one.
^^^^ this man gets it.
I like firearms. I would qualify as "a redneck".
I also think you should need to go through a minimum 2 day safety, maintenance and storage training course to own one. They are a tool that you must prove you are safely capable of handling, maintaining in safe operation (no exploding barrels), and keeping secure.
This and also lets not restrict weapons cause scarry. I fear a shotgun far more than an assault rifle in untrained hands, mostly cause it takes an afternoon to learn how to use a shotty while it takes a good bit more to use really any rifle.
He is living proof that the Horseshoe Theory is correct and true
EDIT: I thought we left reddit to get away from the mindless downvoting hivemind BS
We have an /S for a fucken reason.
How about if you disagree, tell me why so we can have a nice discussion here instead of making folks feel like idiots.
This is the internet, there are folks who will legit say that unironically. Leaving a /S tells us ya aint serious. Sinple as.
I'm a little confused why they wouldn't have him endorse Kamala instead if he was supposed to be a spoiler.
I'm not sure I follow;
If his goal was to pull voters away from Kamala, why would he endorse her?
Yeah...you're right it doesn't really make sense. I guess my thought was that he was supposed to be posing as an alternative liberal, but if he's out, that's irrelevant.
They aren't bright people
He may or may not know he was a spoiler, right now his most important task is to try and grab a hold of a cabinet position in whoever wins. He knows Kamala isn't stupid enough to give his brain worm any power, but Trump is absolutely corrupt and stupid enough to do so.
I have a feeling that it was Trump's idea, as he grew up in the decades when the Kennedy name meant something in politics, especially Democratic politics, so he figured the name would draw Democrat voters, not realizing that the Kennedy name hasn't had any sway in Democrat politics for the last three decades or so, as the party moved on from the Kennedys long ago. Just showing again that Dastardly Don is old and out of touch.
With Kennedy out of the race, that frees up more of the oligarch money to bolster the Jill Stein and Cornel West campaigns instead.
So can you straighten this up for me? Because it's not clear right now.
Is Cornel West actually running? As in, does he think he's running for office?
Yes, Cornel West is campaigning as an independent. Here's his website if you want to learn more about his platform.
Based on his stated policies, he'll attract more leftist voters away from the Harris campaign as a spoiler candidate, whereas Kennedy was the "centrist" option who ended up pulling away more non-MAGA Republicans than he did conservative Democrats.
West's calls to disband NATO and end US involvement in Ukraine also makes him a favorable option for Russia.
West is also not on the ballot in most states:
In point of fact, he's on the ballot in few enough states that he can't achieve more than be a spoiler in Georgia.
Yeah, but that alone is a big fucking problem (I say as a Georgian, and especially one who has been trying to raise the alarm about the MAGA sabotage being perpetrated in my state). Having a spoiler candidate on the ballot only makes it even more likely that the MAGAs find some excuse to refuse to certify.
It doesn't seem to matter. Russia is running on behalf of he and Stein.
He was running with People's Party, then tried to run with Green Party, and is now running as an independent.