632
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 weeks ago

Conservative Sunni Islam's attitude towards women basically boils down to men needing to see as little as possible of them, lest they become uncontrollably rapey. Shia are a little bit less misogynistic, and Sufi are significantly less so.

[-] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Conservative Sunni Islam's attitude towards women basically boils down to men needing to see as little as possible of them, lest they become uncontrollably rapey.

I find that so utterly bizarre, like, you can't control your sexual impulses like a normal person does unless every woman in your field of vision is dressed like a Halloween ghost?

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's the woman's fault, obviously!

Edit: also, your comment is ironic given your username. One of the GOAT sexual deviants...

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

Sunni Islam does not prescribe women being fully veiled nor does it forbid schooling. The Taliban are following tribalism not Islam.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago

I used "conservative" for a reason. Sunni men writ large consider the hijab mandatory, but not face coverings.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

There is no conservative version of Sunni Islam which prescribes it. The word conservative means to adhere to tradion.

Worlds first university was created by an Islamic Sunni woman.

Full face coverings were only prescribed for the women of the Prophet. This is universally accepted.

What the Taliban is following is nothing more than tribalistic misogyny. A red pill cult. It has nothing to do with Islam.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

I guess it's just a coincidence that the most conservative Sunni countries are aggressively misogynistic? Unless Wahhabists are actually secret feminists.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's more like societies with endogamous communal family structures like Islam -- not even Sunni in particular. The worst misogyny historically doesn't even happen there though but in exogamous communal family structures, things like widow burning in India, feet binding in China, or rape of your daughter-in-law in Russia: In the endogamous setting, all the misogyny is happening within a clan structure that includes the woman's close kin, while in the exogamous setting she's on her own.

Anthropologists are still very much in the process of figuring stuff out but particular family structures correlating to differing preferences in political ideology is a very interesting topic, it's mostly thought of as representing deeper social values and ideal that are hard to get a handle on. No I won't link Todd right now the guy has gone off the deep end regarding Ukraine, his stuff is worth reading but don't only read him -- not just because of Ukraine.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Wahabism originated in Saudi Arabia, which worked with the British to overthrow the Islamic Caliphate.

Anything originating in Saudi for the past few centuries should be taken with a large amount of salt.

Islam Doesn’t Deny Women Education, So Why Does the Taliban?

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

"Saudi misogyny is actually the fault of the British" is the second-most hilarious take I've read all year, right behind "making fun of LLMs for being bad at math is ableist" (an actual post I read on Mastodon).

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

The Caliphate was Islamic. Saudi waged war against the Caliphate.

Nothing here blames the British for misogyny. That is a strawman.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
632 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
1029 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS