193
My Solution For A Large F-16 Combat Radius:
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
193 points (99.5% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6625 readers
425 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !combatvideos@sh.itjust.works
- !militarymoe@ani.social
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Nah. Planes like this actually are a thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin-fuselage_aircraft
Thats the joke.
The P-38 is a WWII era twin fuselage fighter.
No. It's a twin engine fighter. It only has one fuselage. The fuselage is the main body of a plane, which holds the cabin for the pilot in this case, which there is only one.
Edit: The concept here in the top left would've made it a twin fuselage plane. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning_fighter_concept_silhouettes.png
What if the co-pilot is in the other side? He could become the pilot if something happened to incapacitate the pilot, and can also cast a tie-breaking vote in the senate.
Vice Pilot Kamala "Bomber" Harris
God, if she said "Putin had sowed the wind and now Moscow shall reap the whirlwind" that would get all of my votes.
I stand corrected, didn't think it through that much.
Technically an interceptor, but in reality A FUCKING BADASS KILLING MACHINE.
Glad someone got it
the above is more like an XP-82 than a P-38.