137
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Reverendender@sh.itjust.works to c/ethicalconsumerism@sh.itjust.works

I don’t know about y’all, but I will not ever be going shopping here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago

"You should let us reduce competition in the grocery space, because with less competition prices will be lower."

That's a bold take.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

$omething tell$ me it will probably $till work though.

[-] Zess@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Walmart has been doing it for decades to achieve its low prices. The problem isn't that it won't work, it's just still a shitty thing to squeeze every cent from your suppliers.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Wal*Mart does definitely squeeze their suppliers, and it does have relatively low prices, but it's hardly a charity. It squeezes suppliers, not so that it can supply customers with low prices but so that it can provide profits to investors.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Economies of scale do allow for lower prices. Problem being, monopolies do not.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Economies of scale allow for lower costs, not lower prices. Lower prices are a choice that companies make, and it's a choice they don't have to make if they don't have competitors.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
137 points (95.4% liked)

Ethical Consumerism

104 readers
1 users here now

A place to strategize, plan, execute, and support each other in reducing reliance on unethical consumer goods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS