136
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Reverendender@sh.itjust.works to c/ethicalconsumerism@sh.itjust.works

I don’t know about y’all, but I will not ever be going shopping here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] technomad@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 days ago

'improving their services'

=

extracting more value from their consumers

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

This is where we're at now, corporations are issuing demands to the government, and the government is appeasing them.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago

Sounds like extortion to me. Revoke their licenses to do business until they replace their C-suite.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago

We passed that when the government order Microsoft to break up.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago
[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Replied to wrong comment. Someone else said something about now the corps are giving orders to the government. My response was that when MS was ordered to be ask up, they more or less said "nope"

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago

Fuckin lies.... No for profit business ever said hey let's spend a bunch of money to buy another business to make less money.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Those blackmailing fucks can go to hell

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 48 points 6 days ago

They aren't even saying that.

After the merger closes, Kroger will invest $1 billion to lower Albertsons’ prices, consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation and providing value to customers.

So, they're going to invest $1 billion to lower prices (which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain").

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation

LOL, fucking what? They're literally one of the major causes of inflation.

which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

Oh, so firing more people, adding more self-checkout lanes, charging more for bags, and extorting distribution centers so they also have to fire a bunch of people?

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

Which they already claim they actively do in order to lower prices

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

That just sounds like sourcing lower quality food stuff to save their bottom line

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Nah it's going to be a billion dollars and putting those prices that can change at the drop of a hat with AI is help The digital ones. They're expensive

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

No that sounds an awful lot like extortion. That's a crime you know.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 days ago

"You should let us reduce competition in the grocery space, because with less competition prices will be lower."

That's a bold take.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

$omething tell$ me it will probably $till work though.

[-] Zess@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Walmart has been doing it for decades to achieve its low prices. The problem isn't that it won't work, it's just still a shitty thing to squeeze every cent from your suppliers.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago

Wal*Mart does definitely squeeze their suppliers, and it does have relatively low prices, but it's hardly a charity. It squeezes suppliers, not so that it can supply customers with low prices but so that it can provide profits to investors.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Economies of scale do allow for lower prices. Problem being, monopolies do not.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

Economies of scale allow for lower costs, not lower prices. Lower prices are a choice that companies make, and it's a choice they don't have to make if they don't have competitors.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Someday, maybe soon, you won't have a choice but to shop at a Kroger grocery.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

Enhance your calm, friend! 🙂

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Ok. But your tax base is tripled and we set price ceilings on certain goods.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

And then immediately raise them 5x a week later

[-] DynoNoob@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Yes. If there's one thing that all corporations want, it's to MAKE LESS MONEY.

That's why they want to reduce competition. It's so people can give them less money.

Now, some people might suggest that this sort of selfless generosity might go against their fiduciary obligation to increade stockholder value. But those people would be wrong because of course they're only doing this to eliminate competition and gouge customers, you bunch of gullible idiots.

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

*terms and conditions apply. This offer is subject to change after one year of operation

[-] cryptiod137@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

If they take them over and can't fix Albertsons ( supply chain inefficiency is what I've been told), then the whole organization is gonna go under within a few years.

That almost sounds like a good thing, but I know that it wouldn't be .

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I thought "bidenomics" inflation dictated prices?? /s

?????

So it really is corporate greed then

(I know it's corporate greed, but I wanted to counter all the naysayers that say the price of groceries is strictly because of inflation)...

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Yeah sure they will.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

Thank the gods I have HEB

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago

Kroger promises to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after artificially inflating them by $3 billion.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Oh, so just like their normal “sale” items.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

This item is $9000, but if you let us track your purchases and give us all of your personal information, it's $3.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 week ago
[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

More like extortion.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago

Literal blackmail. Agreed

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

Why would anyone trust them right after the price gouging during the pandemic and long after logistics had adapted?

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

That’s the neat part, we don’t.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
136 points (95.3% liked)

Ethical Consumerism

85 readers
1 users here now

A place to strategize, plan, execute, and support each other in reducing reliance on unethical consumer goods.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS