745

The six-year-old student who shot his teacher in the US earlier this year, boasted about the incident saying "I shot [her] dead", unsealed court documents show.

While being restrained after the shooting at a Virginia school, the boy is said to have admitted "I did it", adding "I got my mom's gun last night".

His teacher, Abigail "Abby" Zwerner - who survived - filed a $40m (£31.4m) lawsuit earlier this year.

The boy has not been charged.

The boy's mother, however, Deja Taylor, has been charged with felony child neglect and misdemeanour recklessly leaving a loaded firearm as to endanger a child.

In Ms Zwerner's lawsuit, filed in April, she accuses school officials of gross negligence for ignoring warning signs and argues the defendants knew the child "had a history of random violence

The documents also mention another incident with the same student while he was in kindergarten. A retired teacher told police he started "choking her to the point she could not breathe".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MonkRome@lemmy.world 163 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's amazing to me how focused these comments are on the child being "evil" and not the environment that created this situation. A child isn't born believing that shooting their teacher is a viable solution to their problems. At 6 years old you're barely functional. For this to happen they had to exist in a profoundly fucked up environment with no moral compass and access to a lot of information, presented without good context, far above their age. Everyone responsible for raising this kid should be held responsible.

This kid needs years of therapy and support and a loving caregiver. Before the age of 10 children are incredibly impressionable and still undergoing very basic core development, until the age of 25 people are still in development to some level. There are many years ahead where this child can be saved from themselves. There is no reason to call a 6 year old irredeemable.

[-] BigDawg@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

It can be both sadly. Some kids are born not right. But will usually be ok with good and professional follow up and loving parents. But there are some kids born without the ability to emphasize with others and that never will get the help they need. And they become terrifying in their teens.

[-] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Empathy is something that is taught. If some kid does not have the ability to have empathy for others, it's likely because they were neglected/abused during childhood, and were not taught such a thing as empathy.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, there really are people who are born without the capacity of compassion and empathy. They can learn to mimic it and live by the laws but it needs therapy and people who catch that there is a problem early enough.

It's actually problematic that people immediately jump to the conclusion that the parents did a poor job, because it leads to people not getting adequate help. It also leads to parents not seeking help because they think they just need to be better at parenting when that's often not going to change all that much.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Everything said above can be true in parts or at the same time. Obviously, this kid had access to a gun and shouldn't have. Likely, the kid has other problems at home. Possibly, the kid has a neurological divergence that hadn't been fully investigated.

Fuck the parent for not securing the gun. Fuck the school for not showing more caution. Fuck the teacher for getting shot… wait… (/s on the last one, of course)

But also, how can a kindergartener choke an adult to the point they can't breathe? I'd think anyone who isn't elderly could throw a child that age. I probably don't have all the facts about that.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

But also, how can a kindergartener choke an adult to the point they can’t breathe?

Because when you do not feel for other people you can go all in. Most people are not brutal and even unintentionally hold back against others. It is also really hard to defend against a child if you don't want to hurt the child.

My neighbours kid broke one of his mother's fingers at an age before he went to school (so he must have been 7 years old max). If you do not want to seriously hurt a child, how do you defend yourself when they won't let go?

[-] poppy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But also, how can a kindergartener choke an adult to the point they can't breathe? I'd think anyone who isn't elderly could throw a child that age.

I wondered this too, and my only (weak) hypothesis is the teacher was too afraid to hurt the child in return before they realized how serious it was going to get. But I’m also not sure how little 5 year old hands would have the strength, unless they used a rope or other tool.

Edit: the article does say the choked teacher is now retired, so they also could have been fairly old.

[-] MonkRome@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Having actually worked around troubled youth and seen literally 100's of children move through the system, I don't think you could be more wrong than you are. Prior to working with troubled youth I assumed it was more like 50/50 environment/genetics. I'm completely convinced it's almost entirely environmental. In nearly 100% of the cases I've seen troubled children, they had parents that were doing something profoundly wrong. Whether it be neglect, violence, sexual abuse, etc, there was always something extremely concerning. I think it is actually incredibly rare for a child to end up severely messed up without extreme "help" from the parents getting there.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

The problem with your anecdotal evidence is that what you experience can simply be the consequence of children only ending up in the system when they have a troublesome environment.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't rule out lack of empathy also being potentially biological / genetic. Empathy is based on feeling which is based on chemicals and hormones in your body. It wouldn't be impossible to be born with the inability to produce/recognize those chemicals/hormones.

[-] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, I agree with this very much.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And their adulthood

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago
[-] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I'd like someone more knowledgeable to confirm this, but I remember that kids cannot be diagnosed certain PDs, so I'm not sure that this can really apply to a child. Also, PDs more often than not derive from childhood problems.

[-] SwagaliciousSR@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

This is somewhat true. I'm fairly knowledgeable about this topic (US) im pretty sure Children still cannot be officially diagnosed with a severe personality disorder until usually 14-18 depending on the state and the personality disorder. Usually it's higher age brackets for more "severe" disorders like aspd. Yet weirdly low for add, adhd and odd. Depends mainly on state.

Many problematic children will be diagnosed with both odd and adhd /add at a young age and the moment they "age out" of youth services they'll be immediately diagnosed with aspd or a whole bouquet of other DSM's. This is one of my bigger pet peeves as parents are often left out of the loop pourpousefully simply as there is no "solution" to a child with such issues other than buttloads of money and time.

To add, as someone who has worked with children and children with behavioral issues. In multiple countries and cultures:

We usually know with like 80% certainty by the time the child is I'd say six or seven, roughly what is wrong with any given child, and can give pretty spot on diagnosis between ourselves. We are ofc not allowed to speak with parents regarding most of these issues, that's a 5 minute talk between a child's psychologist and its parents every six months. And Timmy just can't sitt still for more than 20 minutes! It's a disaster! But other than thst he's a little angel!

Also, imagine telling a Karen her precious angel tried stabbed another kid with scissors?

Yeah I fucking stabbed her, I fucking stabbed the lil bitch in the face cause I fucking hate her fucking bitch"

And then two weeks later you almost loose your job, cause surprise. Timmy just stabbed the lil bitch in the FACE with Scissors. I know from the grapevine Timmy is now in a locked mental health juvie. Like. How do I explain. We all knew? All of us who ever worked with him told each other he was going to spend the rest of his life getting bailed out of jail by mommy and daddy, or dead, or 15-life. We knew he was dangerous. Deranged even. Why dosent anyone listen? Parents didn't care, administration didn't care. Hell the only people who seemed to actually care were us and the girls parents. (big and biggest Bitch)

It's this shit + the metal detectors (+admin) that makes people like me charge 100$/h tutoring autistic kids now instead of working 50% and volunteering 50% at local school districts.

I am not a teacher. Just a giant guy who has always been good with kids. (I never stopped being one)

I dont think im intelligent enough to get into the nature vs nurture argument. It's a doozy. My opinion is "why not both" I've seen both sides proven imo, a good nurture just gives you alot more tools to use.

[-] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Also, imagine telling a Karen her precious angel tried stabbed another kid with scissors?

Yeah I fucking stabbed her, I fucking stabbed the lil bitch in the face cause I fucking hate her fucking bitch"

Holy shit, that's actually disastrous and not something that I could think of, so thank you so much for your insider input. Mustn't be very nice knowing that something terrible has a good chance of happening and not being able to do anything about it.

I dont think im intelligent enough to get into the nature vs nurture argument. It’s a doozy. My opinion is “why not both” I’ve seen both sides proven imo, a good nurture just gives you alot more tools to use.

and I agree with that, dismissing genetics completely also doesn't feel convincing to me. The biggest takeaway that I wanted my comments to have is to keep an eye on the parents, as very often bad parenting bakes tragedies.

[-] Cubes@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Correct. ASPD isn't diagnosed until the child is 18. They usually will diagnose them with "conduct disorder" as a minor instead.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

After the kindergarten incident the child should've been given a psychiatric evaluation. It is possible he's got a "screw loose" but in the vast majority of cases like this you'll find there's violence in the home. The foster system sucks ass, but in this case rolling the dice probably would've led to a better outcome than leaving him in that home.

[-] iegod@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The earliest years are where the individual gains their fundamental personality. This kid is toast, no matter what kind of treatment or assistance they receive. They weren't born this way, but they're now done for.

[-] Elderos 3 points 1 year ago

I assure you, even though it is likely that the environment failed them, some kids are just plain evil and will require lifelong support. Parents arent always to blame.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but parents who leave loaded guns around where their six-year-olds can have access to them are probably to blame.

[-] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Why do you think that some kids are just plain evil? I'm reading several comments stating this thing and it just baffles me, to say the least.

[-] Elderos 9 points 1 year ago

Because my sibling was a psycho, and I doubt there is anything more my parents could have done. You have to get to know one (child or not) to understand that this exists not just in movies.

[-] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Sorry about your experience, I can imagine how terrifying this must be. I guess that there are many reasons why I (like others) am very skeptical about it being just nature, especially considering science doesn't have a definitive answer to this (as far as I know). I know that genetics play a role in predicting future diagnoses. It's just that having full blown personality disorders from childhood (especially when personality is something that you develop during childhood) sounds weird, and many people are labeled "bad" when it's really a dark childhood that is running the scene.

[-] Elderos 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, I never met anyone else like that in my life. I assumed most people with bad behaviours had bad childhood, but I can't deny knowing at least one person with a troubling disorder.

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

People say things like this, then years later find out their siblings/demon kids in their lives were abused (sexually or no) by parents friends/distant relatives etc.

I don’t think people become psychopaths or develop extreme BPD out of nowhere. Like never.

[-] Elderos 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You don't believe in genetic mental illness? That one can be born with a sickness in the brain?

You don't have to believe everyone on the internet, I can only offer you my slice of experience. Nothing wrong happened to my sibling. It was a child who actively tried to hurt people and kill stuff barely after learning to walk. It scared everyone for a while but medication and therapy helped turn they into a stable and functional adult. My sibling is also pretty open about it, at least with me.

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I do believe a lot of our issues are genetic. But we also know different people with identical genetical “problems” will and won’t develop mental illnesses based on their environments and traumatic events in their lives. Epigenetics and all. Like schizophrenia. It was first purely genetic, now we’re pretty sure it’s also environment and experience led.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Because people aren't born as a blank slate, although people seem to like that idea. Genetics play a huge role in personality and character. Some people are born without remorse. They need help and therapy like every other type of disability. But people are just too hung up on the idea of free will and virtuous character values to accept that our brains are organs that can have broken parts.

When you happen to cross paths with someone like that you will know. A kid I know is like this. He would hurt his younger brother to get attention and use other manipulation tactics (at 8 years old!). He will lie straight to your face and it's just obvious he is very different from other children.

His mother had to stop working and basically 24/7 supervise this kid and the overall situation is nightmarish.

[-] Uranhjort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because the world is so much easier to comprehend when you convince yourself some people are just naturally bad and thus undeserving of compassion. To some this is preferable to thinking that an impressionable child may be pushed to violence by their environment.

Never mind that the child was likely mimicking his father (who had attempted to murder his mother on several occasions) and was raised in the kind of environment where a loaded weapon was just left around for him to grab.

[-] Elderos 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, no offence, but you can use that line of reasoning to explain away literally anything.

"Because the world is so much easier to comprehend when you convince yourself all people are just naturally good, and thus can always be saved."

I was born and raised with a psycho, I really wished for the longest time that my sibling was normal and just acting out. I guess having first-hand experience with a sick person will erase someone's doubts real quick.

Nobody is trying to invalidate your experience, but we also can't take your story and assume it applies to a random child in the news that has nothing to do with your story.

[-] Uranhjort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not explaining away anything, nor denying that dangerously violent or even psychotic children exist. I was specifically railing against the idea of condemning a real, life human child because you have decided that they were "born bad", in face of the plentiful evidence that they were raised in a violent environment.

For what it's worth I'm sorry you had to go through that, but you're not the only one who grew up with someone unstable and violent. I would not presume to speak to your experience, but in my case I was all too privy to the neglect and abuse they were put through and it's left me convinced that barring any actual inborn neurological damage the only way a child turns violent is if something is pushing them to act that way.

[-] Elderos 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was not making a statement on the specific child in the article, I also mentioned that the environment is often the most important factor. I am just raising the fact that in some cases it can be a mental disorder, and it is not about deciding who is born bad, but assessing correctly every situation so you can do the greatest good, and protect yourself. I think we agree mostly, maybe my original comment could sound reductionist to some ears, but I tried my best to convey that I was pointing out a rare scenario, specifically to counter the arguments that you can't have this sort of mental disorder at the time of birth. It is important to point out, otherwise innocent parents will get harmed (not those in the article, obviously)

[-] MonkRome@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe not always, but nearly always. Which begs the question why people are so keen to blame a 6 year old kid here and not the parents? It feels to me like it's just easier for people to simplify matters by blaming the person involved because the alternative is messy and complicated.

[-] HerrLewakaas@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

There are exceptions to every rule. Some kids are born evil, although you're probably right that the parents suck too

True, but we have no idea if this child is a born psychopath or not. We do know they did something extremely depraved and were raised very poorly.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
745 points (97.3% liked)

News

23644 readers
3713 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS