170

Jury defies judge and refuses to convict Palestine Action activists (skwawkbox.org)

submitted 1 month ago by grue@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 53 points 1 month ago

In order to be able to appeal directly to the jury, the actionists then represented themselves in court and reminded the jury members of their right to acquit as a matter of conscience, regardless of legal argument.

This led to a hung jury. The state is expected to continue to pursue a conviction, with a retrial likely in February 2026. Palestine Action said this would create “another opportunity to expose who the real criminals are”.

The state didn't get the result they wanted so they're just doing it again. That's cool. Much legitimate, very justice.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

mistrials usually lead to a new trial.

[+] bassomitron@lemmy.world -19 points 1 month ago

[deleted]

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

A jury isn't allowed to change what the law is

Maybe not, but the whole reason jury nullification exists is so that if the jury feels the law is unjust or the reason a person broke the law is so wholly justified they have a way to rule accordingly

It's an important cornerstone of our legal system. Laws are written by humans and they can be flawed and/or unjust or written for malicious purposes. There should always be a failsafe lever to pull in the legal system and jury nullification is that failsafe

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And the only reason he can be retried is that not all jurors agreed. Had they just refused to enforce the law, then they walk free forever (at least from that crime).

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

If the jury can't make one time exceptions to the law then there's no reason to have a jury. The entire point of a jury is to prevent the government from oppressing the people via the court room.

[-] femtech@midwest.social 17 points 1 month ago

Right to Acquit is for unjust laws though.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024

170 points (97.8% liked)

UK Politics

3066 readers

162 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk