1570
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Allonzee@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Did I say mandatory? I meant optional! You're "free" to die in a cardboard box under a freeway as a market capitalist scarecrow warning to the other ants so they keep showing up to make us more!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

TBH I'm not even considered middle class where I live but I have Unrealized Gains in the form of $VYM and Bitcoin.

I think we should tax loans where stocks are used as Collateral, or set a high bar for Unrealized Gains Tax.

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The bar being talked about right now is a net worth of 100million usd, do you have a net worth of 100million? If not your bitcoin is safe.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Maybe some current proposed legislature has set that bar, but this picture of a tweet does not talk about that.

[-] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That picture is referencing Kamala's proposed tax policy where she wants to tax unrealized capital gains on individuals worth 100mill exclusively

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The tweet does not say Kamala, it does not mention "The President's Budget" that was announced by Biden early this year, it just says that unrealized gains are not being taxed.

There is of course the implication of modern policy but I think it is healthy to include nuance and context as I have.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's almost like things can exist in a cultural context without explicitly defined connections.

Just say "oh, I didn't realize" instead of digging your heels in.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago

Whats your problem, mate? Why is context and discussion banned in your world?

You'll only help the liars and fiends by painting Kamala's policy as anything other than what it is.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Says the person doing that exact thing?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have done nothing but add context, much to your chagrin.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That has been the baseline since the beginning. If you aren’t worth 100million there is no reason you shouldn’t support this.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago

There's no reason to support it if you are worth that much.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah the double negative in there

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

There is no beginning, Unrealized Gains taxes were enforced from the founding of this nation until the late 1960s when general properties taxes in the states shifted to no longer include intangible assets, and have been a hot topic the entire time.

If you're referring to the President's Budget plan announced bt Biden early this spring then thats fine. But they didn't mention it.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Any reported bitcoin savings are unsafe because the database will get leaked. The first rule of Bitcoin is "Never tell anyone how much bitcoin you have."

Of course, one could always just lie, but that hasn't been even close to necessary for anyone's safety yet.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
1570 points (96.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5412 readers
1908 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS