856
Selective rage (slrpnk.net)
submitted 13 hours ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/memes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 37 points 4 hours ago

I only care when it's stupid, like Medieval Poland being full of black people, not even modern day Poland has that many black people.

You can call me racist if you want but casting a black guy to play the president of the USA in like 1910 would be as stupid as casting a white guy to play Nebuchadnezzar.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 48 minutes ago

Meanwhile middle age fantasy had black knights and it was fine.

Racists are gonna be racists is all there is.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

You can call me racist

As tone deaf as it gets.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 37 points 2 hours ago

The Witcher isn't in Medieval Poland though, it's in a fantasy land.

Rings of Power was far more dumb because there's black people, but only in a few extremely important roles. Almost as if there's some sort of reverse curse going on, where a baby pops out black, and they immediately make it their king/queen. Or more likely, they realised very late on that they'd made a very white cast, and made a few last minute changes.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

I sometimes think the token representation is on purpose. Riles up the “anti-woke” and means that internet discourse about your show is all about how there’s some black people, not about how shit the writing is.

Like I really don’t give a rats ass if the dwarves are brown or purple or pink. (Although the lack of bearded dwarf women is unacceptable.) The other changes in Rings of Power are actually bad.

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

The Witcher isn’t in Medieval Poland though, it’s in a fantasy land.

So by that logic it's fine to make Wakanda full of white people because it's fantasy land right?

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

I mean yeah. If the writers wanted to make Wakanda have white people, that would be fine.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 59 minutes ago

Wakanda is supposed to be in Africa, where Uganda is irl.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 hour ago

Wakkkanda it is.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 51 minutes ago

Sure it would, if the writers had written it that way. South Africa is full of white people, it might have even made sense.

But since they didn't do that, and then wrote their entire storyline around having not done that, this is a poor argument.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 hours ago

It'd be as bad as having people of color play Hamilton and associates!

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

"Here are three examples I made up to prove how not racist I am!"

[-] androogee@midwest.social 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Representation matters. Giving the few traditionally non-white roles that get written in Hollywood to white actors is an actual problem.

Getting mad about the existence of black characters in fiction fucking stupid. Really fucking stupid. Unjustifiably fucking stupid. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

100% agree, but what should be done would be to green light projects by writers of other races based on different cultures and folklores diversifying the pop culture space (for lack of a better term).

What is done instead is treating minorities as a checklist that needs to be checked in every piece of art even when it doesn't make sense for them to be in that story.

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Getting mad sure, but it is definitely a dumb creative decision to have characters be random races that don't make sense in the historical context and it's fine to criticize it. If it's a purely fictional world with no basis in reality then no one should care.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

No. Fuckin stop it. Its unbearably stupid.

Historical fiction has existed for a long time.

Y'all ain't out here throwing a pouty parade when someone adds technology or magic or monsters into historical fiction.

But black people? Existing? If that's where you draw the line, it's really clear why. Make all the excuses you want.

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Historical or alternate history fiction falls under pure fiction imo. That's fine as long as it makes sense. If it's meant to be some super grounded realistic historical slice-of-life then it would just make me think "when are they going to bring up the fact that there's X type of person walking around here" for the whole story.

Not exclusive to black people. If there were a story that took place in 12th century Mongolia and there was some Nordic guy walking around I would be like "huh, what's his story" and then be confused when it was never mentioned. That's how I feel about a lot of these creative choices.

[-] androogee@midwest.social -5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That's literally just a longer way of saying that it's okay if it's magic but it's not okay if it's black people.

& yeah, I'll hold my breath for people getting equally upset about white people in fiction. Any day now. I'm sure.

I can't disapprove a hypothetical, I guess, but a hypothetical isn't proof of anything either.

[-] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

But magic doesn't have any grounding or association with the world as we know it. Neither does aliens. We can only use the world as we know it as a frame of reference for a story.

I'd argue in lbaudia's example that it is confusing if in 12th century Mongolia, there was some Nordic guy walking around. I'd imagine there to be a backstory of some kind. If there wasn't, then that would definitely be an example where I'd be annoyed at white people in fiction.

I thought a great example of casting was the TV show "The Expanse". To be able to cast someone as specific as Bobbie Draper so well - these studios have no excuse to whitewash as they do except laziness.

[-] androogee@midwest.social -1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

People made these exact same arguments about the inclusion of a black samurai in an Assassin's Creed game.

A black samurai who was based on a real person who actually existed in history.

The game they're playing is very obvious to anyone who's actually paying an ounce of attention, and it has nothing to do with caring about historical accuracy.

It's bullshit. It's an excuse. It's foolish. I do not suffer it gladly.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Oh the sweet voice of a reason, they don't take well to that around here. Good on you.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

sounds like some men in black 3 setting

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
856 points (89.9% liked)

memes

9705 readers
2747 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS