248
submitted 1 month ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

an average of 54 miles each day

It also mention she ran 17 jours a day. I can't imagine the kind of energy it takes to keep that pace going for 40 days. Absolutely insane.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 38 points 1 month ago

17 jours a day

Damn, she went to another planet?

[-] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

How long is an hour on jupiter?

[-] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

A Jupiter day is 10.5 Earth hours, so if we take the definition of 1h = 1/24 of a day, a Jupiter hour would be 10.5 / 24 = 26 min. So 17 Jupiter days fit well inside an Earth day, you got something!

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The more you spread that over the day the better. Higher intensity will kill you, you want lower intensity.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 27 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure two marathons per day can be qualified of lower intensity.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Both of you are kind of right. It's still an insane feat of endurance but averaging an 18 minute mile is pretty damn slow and likely zone 2-3 even in rugged terrain for an athlete like her.

High intensity isn't just a generalized term but specific to heart rate, lactate buildup, and anaerobic states.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

A friend of mine regularly runs trail ultra-marathons. She calls it "assisted hiking".

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The amount of work done and intensity (the rate at which work is done) are two different measurements.

[-] oce@jlai.lu -2 points 1 month ago

2 marathons per day is a measure of intensity.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Seriously? There is a difference in intensity between 2 marathons over 17 hours, vs 2 marathons over 8 hours. The higher intensity is harder, that's why you get a medal for finishing fast.

[-] oce@jlai.lu -2 points 1 month ago

Indeed, what disturbs you in what I said?

[-] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

So is 0 marathons per day. Your point is?

[-] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 month ago

Nothing else, that it is also an intensity, despite what the reply seems to incorrectly imply. Did you understand something else?

[-] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Of course it can. You just need to define what you're comparing it against. Surely two marathons per day is lower intensity than two marathons per half-day or 3 marathons per day.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

Compared to the common sport professional performance, I would say. Not many people can do a marathon, less two in the same day, even less two per day during 40 days.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That’s like 3mph for 17 hours. Jesus…. That’s a lot of wheaties… by my back of the napkin calculations that’s burning like 4200 calories a day.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

3mpg for 50 miles is mind blowing. Starts to make sense how we're enduranc hunters.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
248 points (97.3% liked)

News

23361 readers
3235 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS