589
February 20, 1927 (cdn.masto.host)
submitted 1 month ago by lnxtx@feddit.nl to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://mastodon.uno/users/rivoluzioneurbanamobilita/statuses/113485559637864463

La soluzione al #traffico era già nota nel 1927

In un manifesto dell'azienda di trasporto di Wichita Falls, si chiede di dare priorità al trasporto di massa, perché molto più efficiente: in un #tram possono sedersi comodamente le persone portate da ben 28 #auto (con 2 persone per auto, stima ottimistica).

100 anni fa era già tutto li: problema e soluzione

@energia #mezziPubblici #mobilitaSostenibile

Trovata qui:
https://www.facebook.com/100033858551663/posts/1365019054636700/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] flavonol@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

How do you interpret "averages 1 3-5 passengers"?

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 8 points 1 month ago

It's country of the freedom, so it's weird.
My interpretation: 1 3/5 = 1.6

[-] jwt@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

I'd advise against using the phrase '3/5ths of a person', but I guess you can always count on Americans (and Texans in particular) to make stupid decisions.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 1 month ago

Going by that interpretation, 1 + 3/5, all the cars are Driving Miss Daisy.

That is obviously a bad comparison, because there's no way that old hag would ever set foot on a tram.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

3 to 5 on average

I think it's a speech thing that got written down, but then also written as the number instead of the word.

Like they use of the word "one" like this:

That's one weird thing to do.

That's a weird thing to do.

So I read that as:

averages 3-5 passengers

averages a 3-5 passengers

averages one 3-5 passengers

averages 1 3-5 passengers

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It seems odd that the average would be a range... Or that the range would include 5! I think 1 3/5 = 8/5 is more likely. Especially since they go on to assume 2 passengers, which would be pretty disengenuous if the average was higher than 2.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

I can totally follow that logic. 1 and 3/5ths, rounding up to 2 for the next hypothesis. Very plausible explanation.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
589 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9805 readers
154 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS