this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
910 points (95.9% liked)

Greentext

5777 readers
2434 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 42 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's not a problem until someone tells you to not refer to them as a dude or a guy. If you continue, you are just an asshole 🤷🏻

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Sure, but we're talking plurals of strangers atm. "Please don't call me a guy going forward" is a different conversation than "what you just said is stupid, mean, and wrong".

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your facts are not what OP wrote, though. And in this context the facts are relevant, which is the point.

Bad red herring.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

We don't know what happened. What makes you think that what op wrote isn't the facts. I can totally see something like that happening it's not at all unbelievable.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Or, just maybe. The person remarking is an asshole. It gives off the same energy as correcting grammar when talking with someone.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

Why does the other persons energy matter? If someone requests not to be called something and you continue to call them that then you are kinda being a jerk. It's not the same as correcting someone's grammar.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It gives off the same energy as correcting grammar when talking with someone.

Is this a personal attack?

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Sir, you're an officer of the law. You can't help but be who you are. It's ok to own it.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

There is a time and a place for it. Just not when you want someone to agree with or like you. 🙂

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It’s just as much not a problem for them to be offended by it as it is for you to choose your words better. Knowing that you made a choice to offend so yeah, you’re the jerk. You’re honestly making a lot more of it if you went all this distance to think you’re the one hard done by just cuz you refuse to memorize some words. That’s snowflake thinking.

Only bad actors looking for the drama go for the path of most resistance.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Changing the language you intuitively use is hard

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There are harder things in life that are actually worth complaining about. Growing your brain isn’t one of them.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

L + ratio + 5 days too late for me to care

[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago (28 children)

I mean I'll be nice about it and correct to girls or ladies or whatever, but that conversation is probably over

load more comments (28 replies)