29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you object to surveillance you should have objected about 20 years ago.

This is nothing to do with surveillance and everything to do with people wanting to go to drive their massive 4x4 around in a city.

I get why they're not happy about it, but at the same time sod them and their NIMBY attudes. The reason that these laws are necessary is because people will insist on buying stupid massive cars that do 8 miles to the gallon.

[-] Syldon@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

OR drive Diesels without particle filters fitted. There is zero evidence that the information stored by ULEZ is anything more than the registrations of cars that are more dangerous than is acceptable. If you are part of the 90% of people who drive cars within the standard then there is no need to keep the information on file.

[-] Treczoks@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That could be done quite easy by just increase the tax on more wasteful and polluting cars. No need to put up cameras at each corner.

[-] midgephoto@photog.social 1 points 1 year ago

@echodot @CookieJarObserver
Also to there being more people.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

ULEZ is about particulates, not gas guzzling. Unfortunately, it won't take many SUVs off the road. It affects petrol cars registered before 2006 and diesels before 2015.

90% of cars (and 95% of trips) are already compliant. There is a scrappage scheme to help people switch to a compliant model.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4060 readers
269 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS