this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
994 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

6706 readers
2182 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Mythbusters embodied the scientific method, but I do wish they'd stopped to actually properly explain it at some point. "Writing it down" is definitely part of the process, but it's not the whole process. The whole process is what they actually did in most of their episodes:

  1. Make a prediction
  2. Design an experiment to test that prediction
  3. Run the experiment and observe the results
  4. Come up with a conclusion

Sometimes they played fast and loose with some of these steps to make entertaining TV. But, fundamentally, they were doing science.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Screwing around still covers parts 1-3 though. You say something stupid (hypothesis), your friend dares you to do it (experimentation planning), and you do it (experiment).

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You say something stupid (hypothesis), your friend dares you to do it

What's the hypothesis there?

"I'm going to piss on that window." doesn't involve a testable hypothesis.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

I could totally chuck an egg on that roof!

Nuh uh your arm is worse than mine!

Chucks the egg

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I mean presumably they wrote it down when they wrote the script