this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
278 points (97.3% liked)

politics

22011 readers
4314 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 119 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

NGL if the USA invades anywhere other than Russia, I'll be enlisting for the other side.

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 89 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

As a Canadian, the moment tanks roll across the border I'm going feral. This is not the future we were promised in our youth. Sovereignty is non-negotiable.

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm with you buddy i will use the rest of my life making canada a useless wasteland before i let those fucktard take 1 inch of land

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why make Canada a wasteland when you can literally drive across one of the world's longest borders in an American made pickup, wearing American clothes, with an American gun?

A Canadian insurgency wouldn't happen in Canada. It would happen in the US. We're not talking about the Taliban setting roadside bombs in Falujah here; we're talking about angry Canucks in GM pickups rolling up on Mitch McConnell's house with AR-15s that they bought in a parking lot with US dollars and no ID. There are a hundred senators and five hundred and thirty-eight house representatives in the federal government alone. How many do you think would have to die before they started to seriously reconsider the entire notion? How long would they want things to continue when every public appearance is a death sentence?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Might I suggest buying a few cheap drones? If every Canadian had five cheap drones and access to special recipes any occupation would be costly and extremely expensive.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only recipes I have are for muffins. I'm a terrible baker though, so that might still work.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Make the muffins using Styrofoam and gasoline.

Stuff Styrofoam in a glass container. Fill up.

When ready to bake Heat wick to 350°

^I love the smell of napalm muffins in the morning.^

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Just like momma used to make when protesting animal testing!

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I saw really interesting piece of commentary on this from a guy who studies US politics and military interventions. His point was really simple; the one big takeaway the whole world learned throughout the 2000's and 2010's was that you simply cannot effectively rule a population that does not want to be ruled. The US couldn't do it in Iraq or Afghanistan, with all their firepower and technology and manpower. Even a tiny, tiny fraction of a population choosing resistance is enough to create an unending nightmare for an occupier.

And the difference, the really big difference, was that those countries were an ocean away. A Canadian insurgency wouldn't be US soldiers getting IED'd in Montreal; it would be bombings in the US capitol, in New York, in LA. Canadians look like Americans, dress like Americans, drive the same cars as as Americans, and talk enough like them that the average American would at best think they were from another state; and the two countries are joined by one of the world's longest borders. There is literally nothing that could stop Canadian insurgents from travelling to every single city in the continental US and hitting people right in their homes. It would be "The Troubles" on steroids. And they'd be doing this in a country that gleefully allows people to buy firearms off ebay with no background check or ID.

Imagine what things would have looked like if the Taliban could rock up to the home of any US senator in a pickup with a bunch of AR-15s. They simply do not have the domestic security apparatus to deal with something like that.

[–] derGottesknecht@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

As a German I will join you.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

When does it come good?

(I’m well aware that it never will come good as part of the plan.).

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

if the military doesnt go against trump and refuse, itll be a repeat of “just following orders”

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nah bruv, it’s probably far more effective to engage in sabotage at home.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Start with the propaganda outlets and think tanks.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That harms citizens, I'd rather just take out the armed.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can sabotage all kinds of things that wouldn't harm citizens. Military bases. Republican headquarters. Roads and rail used to transport military equipment.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe once or twice, but not consistently. The higher value the target the higher the risks.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lemmy’s so fkn strange, you got a downvote on this.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The Tankies get mad if the westerners don't harm their own nations.

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The reality is we need resistance at home and abroad if Trump wages war against Canada/Denmark.

I'm ready to do my part. But I'll need good ideas.

So you’re not wrong. But in the context of “the US invades an ally to annex their land because Trump felt like it”, protests are absolutely not going to cut the mustard.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No, seriously, if we get to that state, there genuinely does need to be maximum chaos. I say that as an American.

On an entirely unrelated note, I don’t think it’d be that hard to drop bunches of tinsel strands over electrical substations by drone.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If I was single and childless I'd be more than tempted to go fight in Ukraine. That might be the most productive and objectively noble thing anyone could do right now to stop Putin and maybe, by extension, the US.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

I was tempted but Ukraine made a public statement that they need armaments, not untrained fighters.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

IDK. Luigi did a lot and didn't have to leave the US to do it.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But over there shooting bad people is legal.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

If the only thing stopping you from shooting people is the law then you may not be as good as you think you are

You could do more damage as fifth column resistance from the inside, but enlisting on the opposite side would be easier.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Me too, but why can't we invade anywhere warm?