this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
14 points (93.8% liked)

Canada

8995 readers
1678 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A well-researched piece of journalism on the history of our Canada Pension Plan and how it is currently being managed.

TL; DW: For a while, we had a passively managed CPP fund. Then we switched to an actively managed fund which currently costs us over a billion dollars to manage each year. The rational for this switch is that an actively managed fund can outperform a passively managed fund. Has it? (No, it has not)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dtules@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I think the solution is having these agencies be accountable to the accountability metrics that they set up.

Normalizing mismanagement seems short-sighted to me and ultimately only supports the argument that government is "useless" or "broken".

That extra billion going towards healthcare or education or even back into the pension fund could do a world of good.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, definitely no argument from me there