this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
404 points (99.3% liked)

News

27517 readers
4915 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moody 62 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There's a lot of stuff to unpack in this case, some of which was her fault, and some of which was not. Her lawyer advised her to sign the deportation agreement presented to her assuming they wouldn't follow through with it, and then they did.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is any of it her fault? She never should have been put in a position to sign such an agreement in the first place.

[–] moody 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She is an immigrant and knowingly committed a felony that some people spend a very long time in prison for. People have been deported for much less.

I think weed should be legal in the first place, and I think it's pretty fucked to deport her, but to say she that none of it is her fault is just wrong.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

People are deported to countries they've never been to for much less? Yeah, I don't think so. My point was that she never should have been in a position to sign something that would deport her to fucking Laos.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

... I can't even. Both her lawyer and ICE.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lawyers, plural. She had two different lawyers who both fucked her over.

Incompetent shyster #1:

She took a plea deal and served 2 1/2 years in prison. She said her attorney incorrectly told her the plea deal would not affect her immigration status as a green card holder. But her legal permanent residency was revoked.

Incompetent shyster #2:

At the end of her sentence, Yang was transferred to an ICE detention facility in Minnesota. There, at the advice of another attorney, she signed a document agreeing that a deportation order would be entered against her in exchange for being released from detention.

Despite agreeing to be deported, she and her attorney believed it wouldn't happen, since only a small handful of people are deported to Laos each year, if any, and Laos typically has refused to accept U.S. deportees.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that second lawyer took one hell of a gamble. I see where they were coming from, but those are extremely risky dice to roll... And now their client is in more trouble than ever... Critical failure.

And the first lawyer... I have nothing to say, what a dumbass.

How do I find out these lawyers? 'Cause I'm sure as shit not hiring them.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

IIRC they basically never send anyone to Laos - it's "uncooperative" with deportations. So it wasn't that insane.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Historically sure. Now Trump is in power and deportations are the norm. The lawyer banked on precedent but should have considered president

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Her lawyer is about to be facing a lawsuit.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago