this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
418 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

15130 readers
2670 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27020868

Summary

Minnesota Republican state Sen. Justin Eichorn, who introduced a bill classifying "Trump Derangement Syndrome" as a mental illness, was arrested for allegedly soliciting sex from a minor.

Police say Eichorn believed he was meeting a 16-year-old girl but was actually texting undercover officers. His arrest came just a day after he and four other Republican senators introduced the controversial bill.

Eichorn, who is married with four children, was booked into jail and will be transferred to the Hennepin County Adult Detention Center.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

What makes you think the person in charge of a prison wouldn’t be eager to please Trump in the first place?

Because they can be immediately fired by their boss Gov. Tim Walz, former running mate of Kamala Harris.

I understand the American System is confusing at the best of times and that right now is not the best of times but you're talking straight up nonsense. It isn't possible.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

There are a lot of things happening right now that a younger-me would have thought was "straight up nonsense" and "impossible."

I want to believe that proper protocol will be followed, but I also don't believe there are limits to what the current GOP would try.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I want to believe that proper protocol will be followed

This isn't a matter of "following the proper protocol" it's that there is NO protocol. The action is specifically prohibited by law and is enforceable by a political enemy of President Trump. People comment about "A court has no ability to enforce it's decisions." but in this case it's a STATE and they DO have the ability to enforce a decision.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

there is NO protocol.

Weren't you just arguing that there is protocol that would prevent Trump from overreaching his authority?

That's the "protocol" I'm hoping will be followed - the legal framework that would prevent such fuckery.

At the same time, I expect that those currently in charge of the U.S. see the law not as a barrier, but as an inconvenience.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 20 hours ago

Are you kidding? They could spin it as "Saving a true patriot from the woke mob" and Trump would put him in charge of a federal prison. Any TDS cases in that prisons' admin would jump at the chance to demonstrate loyalty to their emperor.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not confused about the system. I believe you completely about all these checks and balances, and I had no doubt about their existence before you explained them.

What I don’t believe is that any of it will stop him from doing whatever he wants. As evidenced by the events of the past two months. Did Kathy Hochul stop him from dropping Eric Adams corruption charges (yes, I know they were federal)? Did she instruct her AG to file state charges? Did she do anything at all to replace or remove Adams? What makes you think Walz would be any different?

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I believe you completely about all these checks and balances

This isn't a "checks and balances" thing. The Governor of Minnesota has the authority to order actual military firepower, like tanks and helicopters, to maintain order at the facility.

What makes you think Walz would be any different?

Hochul is a corrupt hack, Walz is not.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 hours ago

Tim Walz is not going to mobilize the military to stop one pedophile politician from getting released. Didn’t you just criticize my arguments for being unrealistic? I provided a real, contemporary example of what I’m arguing about. All you’ve done is project some noble fantasy onto a governor you probably had no idea existed until he became Harris’ running mate.