politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It doesn't have to match. It just has to rhyme.
i get it, we’re just not there yet and there’s still time to buy guns before it happens.
a judge can’t lie to federal agents who are trying to arrest someone in their courtroom. It sounds like she did.
this should be encouraging, if anything… this judge put herself on the chopping block in order to defy an immoral but legal order… she’s also probably well versed in the law.
this is the kind of resistance we need! a great ally, and a heroic act…
a martyr.
when they start arresting judges who make rulings they don’t like, that’s the night of long knives rhyming
we should worry about getting this judge elected into political office or something….
and also practice target shooting…
If it's true. These could be manufactured charges. I don't trust Patel or the Trump administration to be honest about that.
And they all clapped at the end.
certainly could be completely fictional charges… if anyone is equipped to fight that, it’s a judge…
That's if they give the judge due process, and don't just immediately claim she's guilty- kinda like they're doing to people they're deporting already. Not a stretch to just skip her due process at this point.
We can play what-if all day long, but that doesn't make it true.
And we can ignore the clear pattern of behavior this admin has already shown so far, but that doesn't make what they are doing any less real; what's your point?
that would be a HUGE stretch
How? They're taking people with no due process and deporting them already. Why would her being a judge make her position any different, if they are skipping due process again? This administration has shown that they don't care about due process- they just make an accusation, and then go straight to "guilty until proven innocent."
undocumented immigrants vs a sitting judge is a pretty big leap… it’s a lot closer than it should be, but a huge leap still
Your point is undermined by the fact that some of the people being rounded up are native, US-born citizens. Which means there is not really any leap to make here.
i think we mostly agree… difference being, you think we’re there, i think we’re approaching there but not there yet….
i wish neither could be right
I, too wish neither of us were right.
never mind, you were right, we are there now
Unarmed liberals need to think about arming themselves.
fuck liberals but yes, everyone not in the trump cult should be armed
We are a long way off from getting rid of capitalism. Best to deal with the liberals and work toward moving left from there. The US has a long way to go.
btw, didn’t the liberals articulate exactly why Patel should’ve been blocked from his appointment to the DOJ, and then approve him anyways?
#maskoff they’re working for the same team, and it’s the oligarchs vs democracy
my enemy’s enemy is my friend…
but most liberals in power seem to be double agents… saying the party line but doing almost nothing for it….
She didn't give them false information at all, she just told them to go talk to her boss.
And a federal agent can't try to arrest someone in a courtroom without a judicial warrant. It sounds like they did.