this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
856 points (98.3% liked)

Transgender

605 readers
1238 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

This guy just keeps getting more and more wonderful ❤️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Joanne’s really milking this cash cow for all it’s worth, and then some. Guess that’s your only option when you’re a one-hit wonder, though. Must not have stumbled across any new content she’s interested in plagiarizing.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

HBO previously did a adaption of The Casually Vacancy. I never watched it but I read the book which is terrible.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Oh, what did you find terrible about the book? I thought it was sad but written with a lot of empathy. I liked the gray characters. It was even worse for me to realize what JKR was like after reading this book that seemed so right to me. But maybe I overlooked something.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

I mean, you could tell the point in book 4 where they said "Fuck it, bring in the ghost writers".

I doubt she's probably written anything in 30 years that wasn't drunkenly pounded out on Twitter

[–] PangurBan@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

You say that like anyone else wouldn't. If life gives you a golden cow, milk the shit out of it. Lol

Let's focus on her being a terrible person instead of making up nonsense reasons to further dislike her. There's no need.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No, I think most people wouldn't. Most people would be happy with literally becoming a fucking billionaire, and would be satisfied at that point.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know any billionaires myself, but judging from what I read and see online that is not what people do when they literally become a billionaire.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I guess it's one of those things, where most people would be satisfied with becoming a billionaire, but generally, the type of people able to become a billionaire, are terrible people that wouldn't be satisfied with becoming a billionaire.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

TIL People who would be satisfied with being a billionaire feel satisfied long before they actually become a billionaire.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 1 points 34 minutes ago

Sounds... terribly logical.

[–] Katzimir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

CouLd you point me to what original she plagiarized? I need some light reading material and this sounds promising.

[–] J1m1ny@lemmy.ca 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 22 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm not a fan of Harry Potter, and don't like Rowling, but I read that whole damn essay and was not at all convinced. Half the examples could be said to be plagiarising each other by the standard they're using. They say at the start the coincidences are too strong to be attributed to tropes, but I really disagree with that. Almost everything they list are common tropes, many even outside magical wizard settings. Mean adoptive family? Did she also plagiarise Cinderella?

Sure, her books generally aren't original themes, but to say they're so similar that they are direct plagiarism is a real stretch in my opinion. Especially when you have to list like 30 books that have one or two things in common each, and mostly in a general sense.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. It shouldn't be considered a crime to use and build on eternal tropes. That's what culture is about. The terrible things about JKR lie elsewhere.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 11 hours ago

I never thought she was a plagiarist, just a hack.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

The first two or three books felt far more like a Roald Dahl novel than any standard issue YA novel.

She's clearly been influenced by other children's books. But yeah, so much of the "Rowling plagiarized!" critique boils down to how bland and generic the story was.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think they're referring to A Wizard of Earthsea? It's been on my reading list for a few years now, but I still haven't gotten around to it.