1730
Lemmyshitpost community closed until further notice
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
1730 points (97.9% liked)
Lemmy.World Announcements
28383 readers
249 users here now
This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.
Follow us for server news 🐘
Outages 🔥
https://status.lemmy.world
For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.
Support e-mail
Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.
Report contact
- DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport
- Email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported)
Donations 💗
If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.
If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us
Join the team
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not that I'm familiar with Rust at all, but... perhaps we need to talk about this.
Lets be productive. What exactly are the moderation features needed, and what would be easiest to implement into the Lemmy source code? Are you talking about a mass-ban of users from specific instances? A ban of new accounts from instances? Like, what moderation tool exactly is needed here?
Speculating:
Restricting posting from accounts that don't meet some adjustable criteria. Like account age, comment count, prior moderation action, average comment length (upvote quota maybe not, because not all instances use it)
Automatic hash comparison of uploaded images with database of registered illegal content.
On various old-school forums, there's a simple (and automated) system of trust that progresses from new users (who might be spam)... where every new user might need a manual "approve post" before it shows up. (And this existed in Reddit in some communities too).
And then full powers granted to the user eventually (or in the case of StackOverlow, automated access to the moderator queue).
What are the chances of a hash collision in this instance? I know accidental hash collisions are usually super rare, but with enough people it'd probably still happen every now and then, especially if the system is designed to detect images similar to the original illegal image (to catch any minor edits).
Is there a way to use multiple hashes from different sources to help reduce collisions? For an example, checking both the MD5 and SHA256 hashes instead of just one or the other, and then it only gets flagged if both match within a certain degree.
Traditional hash like MD5 and SHA256 are not locality-sensitive. Can't be used to detect match with certain degree. Otherwise, yes you are correct. Perceptual hashes can create false positive. Very unlikely, but yes it is possible. This is not a problem with perfect solution. Extraordinary edge cases must be resolved on a case by case basis.
And yes, simplest solution must be implemented first always. Tracking post reputation, captcha before post, wait for account to mature before can post, etc. The problem is that right now the only defense we have access to are mods. Mods are people, usually with eyeballs. Eyeballs which will be poisoned by CSAM so we can post memes and funnies without issues. This is not fair to them. We must do all we can, and if all we can includes perceptual hashing, we have moral obligation to do so.
Something I thought about that might be helpful is if mods had the ability to add a post delay on a community basis. Basically, the delay would be moderator adjustable, but only moderators and admins would be able to see the post for X number of minutes after being posted. It'd help for situations like ongoing attacks where you don't necessarily want to have to manually approve posts, but you want a chance to catch any garbage before the post goes public.
Edit: and yeah, one of the reasons I'm aware that perceptual hashes can have collisions is because a number of image viewers/cataloging tools like xnview mp or hydrus network use hash collisions to help identify duplicate images. However, I've seen collisions between unrelated images when lowering the sensitivity which is why I was wondering if there was a way to use multiple hashing algorithms to help reduce false positives without sacrificing the usefulness of it.
Or just making posts approval only with a mod queue
I'm surprised this isn't linked, there are services that does this for you.
And they are free.
https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-csam-scanning-tool/
I beleive there are several readily available databases of hashes of csam material for exactly this kind of scanning. Looks like there are some open source ones.
Some top results: https://github.com/topics/csam
This looks to be the top project: https://prostasia.org/project/csam-scanning-plugins/
Could they not just change one pixel to get another hash?
I guess it'd be a matter of incorporating something that hashes whatever it is that's being uploaded. One takes that hash and checks it against a database of known CSAM. If match, stop upload, ban user and complain to closest officer of the law. Reddit uses PhotoDNA and CSAI-Match. This is not a simple task.
None of that really works anymore in the age of AI inpainting. Hashes / Perceptual worked well before but the people doing this are specifically interested in causing destruction and chaos with this content. they don’t need it to be authentic to do that.
It’s a problem that requires AI on the defensive side but even that is just going to be eternal arms race. This problem cannot be solved with technology, only mitigated.
The ability to exchange hashes on moderation actions against content may offer a way out, but it will change the decentralized nature of everything - basically bringing us back to the early days of the usenet, Usenet Death Penaty, etc.
Not true.
A simple CAPTCHA got rid of a huge set of idiotic script-kiddies. CSAM being what it is, could (and should) result in an immediate IP ban. So if you're "dumb" enough to try to upload a well-known CSAM hash, then you absolutely deserve the harshest immediate ban automatically.
You're pretty much like the story of the economist who refuses to believe that $20 exists on a sidewalk. "Oh, but if that $20 really existed on the sidewalk there, then it would have been arbitraged away already". Well guess what? Human nature ain't economic theory. Human nature ain't cybersecurity.
Idiots will do dumb, easy attacks because they're dumb and easy. We need to defend against the dumb-and-easy attacks, before spending more time working on the harder, rarer attacks.
You don't get their ip when they post from other instances. I'm surprised this hasn't resulted in defed.
Well, my home instance has defederated from lemmy.world due to this, that's why I had to create a local account here.
I mean defedding the instances the CSAM is coming from but also yes.
I'm sorry but you don't want to use permanent IP bans. Most residential circuits are DHCP meaning banning via IP only has a short term positive effect.
That said automatic scanning of known hashes, and automatically reporting to relevant authorities with relevant details should be doable (provided there is a database somewhere - I honestly have never looked).
Couldn't one small change in the picture change the whole hash?
Good question. Yes. Also artefacts from compression can fuck it up. However hash comparison returns percentage of match. If match is good enough, it is CSAM. Davai ban. There is bigger issue however for developers of Lemmy, I assume. It is a philosophical pizdec. It is that if we elect to use PhotoDNA and CSAI Match, Lemmy is now at the whims of Microsoft and Google respectively.
Honestly I'd rather that than see shit like this any day.
The bigger thing is that hash detection tools don't want to give access to just anyone, and just anyone can run a Lemmy instance. The concern is that you're effectively giving the CSAM people a way to know if they'll be detected.
Perhaps they can allow some of the biggest Lemmy instances to use the tech, but I wouldn't expect it to be available to everyone.
Mod tools are not Lemmy. Give admins and mods an option. Even a paid one. Hell. Admins of Lemmy.world could have us donate extra to cover costs of api services.
I agree. Perhaps what Lemmy developers can do is they can put slot for generic middleware before whatever the POST request is in Lemmy API for uploading content? This way, owner of instance can choose to put whatever middleware for CSAM they want. This way, we are not dependent on developers of Lemmy for solution to pedo problem.
If they hash the file binary data, like CRC32 or SHA, yes. But there are other hash types out there, which are more like "fingerprints" of an image. Think of how Shazam or Sound Hound can recognize a song playing, despite the extra wind, static, etc that's present. There are similar algorithms for images/videos.
No idea how difficult those are to implement, though.
There are FOSS applications that can do that (czkawka for example). What I'm not sure it's if the specific algorithm used is available and, more importantly, if the csam hashes are available for general audiences. I would assume if they are any attacker could check first and get the right amount of changes.
One bit, in fact. Luckily there are other ways of comparing images without actually showing them to human eyes that allow you to calculate a percentage of similarity.
Reddit had automod which was highly configurable.
Reddit automod is also a source for all the porn communities. Have you ever checked automod comment history?
Yeah, I have. Like 2/3 of automod comments are in porn communities.
https://www.reddit.com/r/shitprotips/comments/pkflpd/a_dump_of_random_subreddits_from_automoderators/
What? Reddit automod is not a source for porn. What would be happening is the large quantity of content it reacts to there.
It literally reads your config in your wiki and performs actions based on that. The porn communities using it are using it to moderate their subs. You can look at the post history. https://www.reddit.com/user/AutoModerator It is commenting on posts IN those communities as a reaction to triggers but isn't posting porn (unless they put in their config)
Not worth it if you don't moderate on reddit but read the how to docs for reddit automod, it is an excellent tool for spam management and the source is open prior to reddit acquiring it and making it shit. https://www.reddit.com/wiki/automoderator/full-documentation
No shit, ya don't say?
Where the hell you think I got that list from? I literally filtered every single subreddit that AutoModerator replied in for like three months.
Bruh you're preaching to the person that accumulated the data. That's the data it puked up. I can't help it that most of them happen to be filth communities.
So you should understand that what you said is invalid. Automod doesn't post porn without a subreddit owner configuring it to and just because it posts 2/3 to NSFW subs doesn't mean it is posting content just working more there.
We could 100% take advantage of a similar tool, maybe we some better controls on what mods can make it do. I'm working to bring BotDefence to Lemmy because it is needed.
You completely missed the point.
By the statistics of the data I found, most of the subreddits using AutoModerator are filth communities.
So you can reverse that, check AutoModerator comment history, and find a treasure trove of filth.
I can't help that these are the facts I dug up, but yeah AutoModerator is most active in porn communities.
Too stupid to argue with. You don't even understand your own "data".
No no, I am well aware it's a bot account which is programmed by moderators to filter out certain things and perform other automated tasks.
It just so happens that many of the communities that AutoModerator has to take action in are filth communities.
The best feature the current Lemmy devs could work on is making the process to onboard new devs smoother. We shouldn't expect anything more than that for the near future.
I haven't actually tried cloning and compiling, so if anyone has comments here they're more than welcome.
I think having a means of viewing uploaded images as an admin would be helpful, as well disabling external image caching. Like an "uploaded" gallery for admins to view that can potentially hook into Photodna/CSAI-Match or whatever.
I think it would be an AI autoscan that flags some posts for mod approval before they show up to the public and perhaps more fine-grained controls for how media is posted like for instance only allowing certain image hosting sites and no directly uploaded images.
I was just discussing this under another post and turns out that the Germans have already developed a rule-based auto moderator that they use on their instance:
https://github.com/Dakkaron/SquareModBot
This could be adopted by
lemmy.worldby simply modifying the config fileThat statement is just outright wrong though. They could easily use CloudFlares CSAM monitoring and it never would have been a problem. A lot of people in these threads, including admins, have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about.
Cloudflare CSAM protection is not available outside of the US, unfortunately.
There are several other solutions including ones from Microsoft and Facebook.
Probably hashing and scanning any uploaded media against some of the known DBs of CSAM hashes.
Iirc that’s how Reddit/FB/Insta/Etc. handle it
The sad thing is that all we can usually do is make it harder for attackers. Which is absolutely still worth doing, to be clear. But if an attacker wants to cause trouble badly enough, there's always ways around everything. Eg, image detection can be foiled with enough transformation, account age limits can be gotten past by a patient attacker. Minimum karma can be botted (even easier than ever with AI) and Lemmy is especially easy to bot karma because you can just spin up an instance with all the bots your heart desires. If posts have to be approved, attackers can even just hotlink to innocent images and then change the image after it's approved.
Law enforcement can do a lot more than we can, by subpoenaing ISPs or VPNs. But law enforcement is slow and unreliable, so that's also imperfect.