this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
243 points (99.6% liked)

Games

20748 readers
1354 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Of course it is. Unless they switched to hall effect sticks, which they already said they weren't doing. For whatever reason, they still want to save the pennies instead of using the better component even after the previous issues and lawsuits. Why do companies insist on shooting themselves in the foot constantly?

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

While Nintendo is absolutely to blame for not fixing the situation, I've heard they were not going for hall effect sticks because of the interference with the joycons magnets.

Full disclosure, I have no Switch, Retrodeck Enthusiast here 😁

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So they decided that magnetic joycons versus a new rail design were worth another set of drift lawsuits.

Because any potential new drift lawsuit is going to cite the old one as clear proof that Nintendo knew what would happen, had the opportunity to change the design so it didn't, and decided to do it again anyway.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo choosing the option that is actively worse for everyone including themselves goes well with my theory that Nintendo is actually just evil and making decisions based on spite and disdain for their customers and fans.

[–] emogu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The joycon connection isn’t the only use of magnets I believe. The steam deck has a bunch of magnets too and it’s the reason Valve didn’t include Hall effect sticks in that device. They did a bunch of field tests and found that they created more problems than they solved. Folks who’ve modded their ROG Ally with HES reported similar issues. It just seems like with the current tech they’re just not compatible with handheld consoles.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I design things that use hall effect sensors... The magnets in the joycons would not have interfered. Those magnets are:

  1. Too far away from the sticks to matter.
  2. Perpendicular/orthogonal to the magnets that would be in the sticks.

Besides, you can cram hall effect stuff super tight just by inserting a tiny piece of magnetic shielding between components. Loads of products do this (mostly to prevent outside magnets from interfering but it's the same concept). What is this magic magnetic shielding technology? EMI tape.

There's a zillion types and they're all cheap and very widely used in manufacturing. I guarantee your phone, laptop, and many other electronics you own have some sort of EMI tape inside of them.

Just about every assembly line that exists for mass produced electronics has at least one machine that spits out tape a bit like a CNC machine (or they pay the cheapest worker possible to place it).

[–] wizzim@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the thorough explanation!

Then it's a mystery why the didn't use Hall effect joysticks. It the cost of the part so much more expensive?

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wht spend pennies when you can sell more conrollers? They know that Nintendo boys don't care about money

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They were literally forced to fix/replace broken joycons for free because of the drift issue. In case you weren't aware. I sent two sets away to be fixed, all expenses paid.

That costs them lots of money.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Probably made more from every schmuck who didn't know they would be replaced for free and bought extra.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 2 months ago

Yeah, exactly this. I'm sure they did the math.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nobody fucked with that. Everyone just bought whatever new limited edition colors were out and moved on with their lives.

[–] Starbelliedboy@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lots of people fucked with that. I sent them in for repair twice, I know other people that did. Why spend $80 when they'll fix their garbage equipment for free?

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yet more people just bought new ones, put the old ones in the box, and returned them for a refund while in the free return period, citing them as faulty.

I don't own a switch but I know I would've done that at a large chain electronic shop rather than bother with the repair rigamarole.

[–] Starbelliedboy@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, not everyone is a liar.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Sure, but a lot of people are, and crucially nintendo is.

Also, I'm saying this cost them also on the returns side of things even before the lawsuit.