this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
700 points (98.6% liked)

Selfhosted

46672 readers
1423 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Corporate VPN startup Tailscale secures $230 million CAD Series C on back of “surprising” growth

Pennarun confirmed the company had been approached by potential acquirers, but told BetaKit that the company intends to grow as a private company and work towards an initial public offering (IPO).

“Tailscale intends to remain independent and we are on a likely IPO track, although any IPO is several years out,” Pennarun said. “Meanwhile, we have an extremely efficient business model, rapid revenue acceleration, and a long runway that allows us to become profitable when needed, which means we can weather all kinds of economic storms.”

Keep that in mind as you ponder whether and when to switch to self-hosting Headscale.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Same, my Hetzner proxy running NPM, with pivpn and pihole is doing all it needs to do for $3 and some change.

My only open ports on anything I own are 80, 443 and the wg port I changed on that system. Love it.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How does WG work on the local side of the network? Do you need to connect each VM/CT to the wireguard instance?

I am currently setting up my home network again, and my VPS will tunnel through my home network and NPM will be run locally on the local VLAN for services and redirect from there.

I wonder if there is any advantage to run NPM on the VPS instead of locally?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The vps is the wg server and my home server is a client and it uses pihole as the dns server. Once your clients hang around for a minute, their hostnames will populate on pihole and become available just like TS.

You do have to set available ips to wg's subnet so your clients don't all exit node from the server, so you'll be able to use 192.168.0.0 at home still for speed.

As for NPM, run it on the proxy, aim (for example) Jellyfin at 10.243.21.4 on the wg network and bam.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I am a newbie so I am not sure I understand correctly. Tell me if my understanding is good.

Your Pi-Hole act as your DNS, so the VPS use the pi-hole through the tunnel to check for the translation IP, as set through the DNS directive in the wg file. For example, my pi-hole is at 10.0.20.5, so the DNS will be that address.

On the local side, the pi-hole is the DNS for all the services on that subnet and each service automatically populate their host name on pi-hole. I can configure the DNS server in my router/firewall (OPNSense in my case)

So when I ping service.example.com, it goes through the VPS, which queries the pi-hole through the tunnel and translates the address to the local subnet IP if applicable.

So when I have the wg connection active and my pi-hole is the DNS, every web request will go through the pi-hole. If the IP address is inside the range of AllowedIPs, the connection will go through the tunnel to the service, otherwise, the connection will go through outside the wg tunnel.

Does that make sense?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

the VPS uses the pi-hole through the tunnel

The VPS is Pihole, the dns for the server side is 127.0.0.1. 127.0.0.1 is also 10.x.x.1 for the clients, so they connect to that as the dns address.

server dns - itself

client dns - the server's wg address

On the local side, the pi-hole is the DNS for all the services on that subnet and each service automatically populate their host name on pi-hole. I can configure the DNS server in my router/firewall (OPNSense in my case)

Only if your router/firewall can directly connect to wg tunnels, but I went for every machine individually. My router isn't aware I host anything at all.

So when I ping service.example.com, it goes through the VPS, which queries the pi-hole through the tunnel and translates the address to the local subnet IP if applicable.

Pihole (in my case) can't see 192.x.x.x hosts. Use 10.x.x.x across every system for continuity.

So when I have the wg connection active and my pi-hole is the DNS, every web request will go through the pi-hole. If the IP address is inside the range of AllowedIPs, the connection will go through the tunnel to the service, otherwise, the connection will go through outside the wg tunnel.

Allowed ips = 10.x.x.0/24 - only connects the clients and server together

Allowed ips = 0.0.0.0/0 - sends everything through the VPN, and connects the clients and server together.

Do the top one, that's how TS works.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it.