this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
656 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

1354 readers
30 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i bet none of them would answer the same way if you asked them what a 3rd world country is

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No chance that more than a fourth of them realize it’s from the Cold War and originally mean nations that were neither in the sphere of Soviet or American interest. They just think it means poor country with brown people

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Soviets, eastern Europeans, CHYNA, Cuba and North Korea are 2nd world. Odd that they would omit those countries from their rhetoric ..

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, as the Warsaw pact doesn't exist anymore, there are no second world countries.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The countries still exist .. in one form or another

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But the alliances don't, which is where the term came from. If you're going to get pedantic about it, it's odd to be so selective.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I'm the one being pedantic, gas light much?

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I thought it just meant no nuclear weapons

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 6 points 3 days ago

I believe that would exclude Canada, Aus, and NZ which are pretty firmly considered first world.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

First World: “the west”

Second World: countries contested by the first and third that routinely had/have their sovereignty violated. Integral to “domino theory.”

Third World: socialist/communist nations

Edit: lmao don’t whiskey and lemmy yall. Flipped second and third

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Second World was the Soviets. 3rd world was India and other non-aligned.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

lol yes thank you. Dumb flip there

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder who came up with this nomenclature. Certainly wouldn't be the ones who chose to call themselves 'first world' right?

Glad to see its no longer taken seriously in any sort of academic or intellectual context.