this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
270 points (74.9% liked)

Comic Strips

18399 readers
2048 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The most annoying part is that steel beams don't need to come anywhere close to melting temps to lose structural integrity.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And that the building itself may contain other unknown components that may make a jet fuel fire worse

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I am 99.9999% sure it has already been proven that jet fuel alone was able to defeat the structural integrity of the steel used under those loads, but too lazy to check because disproving a disproven again isn't worth the effort.

No need to add extra details for conspiracy theorists to latch onto.

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What about an airliner's worth of pulverized aluminum?

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was a documentary of a private investigation where they looked into that very topic. It was on very late at night and I fell asleep.

Never seen it since. So pissed about it.

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I saw it something like that in Germany on ARTE, but they didn't produce it themselves. Maybe BBC or so.

It was a documentary looking into several of the conspiracy theories, debunking them.

The airliner's aluminum is the simpler explanation for molten metal than any "thermite" ideas.

I just searched for it, also with chatpgt help, but can't point a finger to the three or for documentaries that seem to come up, it's too long that I've seen it.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That one doesn't bother me quite as much, just because it relies on some finer numbers regarding the structural properties of materials, that people won't realistically have day-to-day experience with. They have to trust sources, which I do understand people sometimes being reluctant to do for whatever reason.

The concept of heat accumulation in an enclosed space is something everyone has experienced, though. If they have cooked, or gotten into a car in the summer, or any other manner of experiences, they should realize how it works with just a minute or less of thinking. If you contain heat, say, inside of a building, it can build up. Simple as that. Very intuitive, can be fully understood by even a small child. These folks would understand it too, if they just thought about it for a second instead of just believing randos on the internet who are appealing to their feelings.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Im sure most people have experience with plastic becoming bendy before it melts. It's not hard to translate that to metal.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, okay I'll grant that.