this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
273 points (75.0% liked)

Comic Strips

18437 readers
2506 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And that the building itself may contain other unknown components that may make a jet fuel fire worse

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

I am 99.9999% sure it has already been proven that jet fuel alone was able to defeat the structural integrity of the steel used under those loads, but too lazy to check because disproving a disproven again isn't worth the effort.

No need to add extra details for conspiracy theorists to latch onto.

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What about an airliner's worth of pulverized aluminum?

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There was a documentary of a private investigation where they looked into that very topic. It was on very late at night and I fell asleep.

Never seen it since. So pissed about it.

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I saw it something like that in Germany on ARTE, but they didn't produce it themselves. Maybe BBC or so.

It was a documentary looking into several of the conspiracy theories, debunking them.

The airliner's aluminum is the simpler explanation for molten metal than any "thermite" ideas.

I just searched for it, also with chatpgt help, but can't point a finger to the three or for documentaries that seem to come up, it's too long that I've seen it.