News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
So now that they're approaching their end game with hispanics they're starting to spin up the machine to go after the next minority. Now where have we seen this before? Been a while, something like 80 years.
They haven't even started yet on finishing off the hate against immigrants. Hell in my part of Oklahoma plenty of Hispanics walking around not even seeming to be concerned. I don't know how they don't see the threat?
My boss who is Hispanic we are right near the border there are ice raids nearly daily
Thinks it's all a hoax cause he doesn't personally know anyone that's been taken or effected.
Your boss is a Nazi.
They voted for Trump
Not that following the law is a big priority for this administration, but doesn't ICE have limited-to-no jurisdiction in OK? I thought they could only operate withing 300mi. of a land or sea border.
EDIT: Nope. As far as I can tell, ICE jurisdiction is anywhere federal law applies.
If the local police or state national guard won’t shoot them, they have jurisdiction.
That's not quite how jurisdiction works. County sheriffs aren't shot at the border when they attend state court (in another county), but they don't have jurisdiction so they can't act as a law officer (e.g. arrest someone) in a foreign county.
But, I agree that when the local police / national guard support / collaborate / conspire with ICE employees we are more likely to see a miscarriage of justice that goes unaddressed as the most likely outcome.
That's a pretty far reaching statement that is wrong in most places. Laws (typically) concerning police are at the state level, and they can act across their state.* Most states also extend jurisdiction to other states' police in specific circumstances. They ALSO extend jurisdiction (which is really sort of a formality because are they actually going to go against the bigger government?) to federal police/agents, typically limited to felonies.
*some exceptions are carved out, like traffic stops and where the arrested are to be transported and by who the arrested will be transported by.
I know that’s not how jurisdiction legally works on paper, but in practice, if ICE can come in and kidnap people off the street at gunpoint and the law enforcement with legal jurisdiction is unwilling to use lethal force to protect their citizens, ICE effectively has jurisdiction. I’d similarly say cartels have effective jurisdiction in parts of Mexico.
You sound like Humpty Dumpty:
Using words that far outside their dictionary or conventional meanings is a not a path to clear communication.
Separately, I checked, and I can no longer find the map of ICE jurisdiction that I was remembering, and as far as I can tell ICE's current jurisdiction is anywhere federal law applies, including Oklahoma. So, I was definitely wrong there.
I inferred from context that you meant that because they don’t have jurisdiction, they can’t arrest people. If that inference was wrong, so be it, but it was a reasonable one.
If they were following the law and don't have jurisdiction, they can't arrest people. But, (a) this administration doesn't follow the law and (b) they do have jurisdiction. So, whatever I meant, I was clearly wrong. 🤣 😢
I do nazi the point your are trying to make here.