this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
394 points (97.6% liked)

News

31513 readers
3087 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As a black male here, I thought I had more time before he circled back. Lol

Edit: I'm only laughing because I saw this coming miles away and it's either that or cry out of frustration.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The majority of the people I work with are black. Most of them don't think trump is going to target them. I've told them and they think I'm crazy. I'm just waiting until they catch up and hope it isn't very much longer.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Most Magats are clueless. My boss is a big fan of Drumpf and her husband is first gen SE Asian here on a marriage visa. Like WTF do you think is going to happen to your husband or your mixed race kid? You think think that just because you voted for Drumpf, he will look the other way? LOL
edit- not saying itdidnttrickledown's coworkers are MAGAs just saying in general. Sorry for confusion.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hate to break it to you but far too many black folks don't think trump is that bad. They are not magats. They just don't think he will come after them since they have guns.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The Black Panthers were armed. Somehow gun laws came to life...

[–] Pissmidget@lemmy.world 132 points 2 days ago

Cool, Epstein files when though?

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So now that they're approaching their end game with hispanics they're starting to spin up the machine to go after the next minority. Now where have we seen this before? Been a while, something like 80 years.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They haven't even started yet on finishing off the hate against immigrants. Hell in my part of Oklahoma plenty of Hispanics walking around not even seeming to be concerned. I don't know how they don't see the threat?

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My boss who is Hispanic we are right near the border there are ice raids nearly daily

Thinks it's all a hoax cause he doesn't personally know anyone that's been taken or effected.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Your boss is a Nazi.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They voted for Trump

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Not that following the law is a big priority for this administration, but doesn't ICE have limited-to-no jurisdiction in OK? I thought they could only operate withing 300mi. of a land or sea border.

EDIT: Nope. As far as I can tell, ICE jurisdiction is anywhere federal law applies.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If the local police or state national guard won’t shoot them, they have jurisdiction.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

That's not quite how jurisdiction works. County sheriffs aren't shot at the border when they attend state court (in another county), but they don't have jurisdiction so they can't act as a law officer (e.g. arrest someone) in a foreign county.

But, I agree that when the local police / national guard support / collaborate / conspire with ICE employees we are more likely to see a miscarriage of justice that goes unaddressed as the most likely outcome.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 15 hours ago

County sheriffs aren’t shot at the border when they attend state court (in another county), but they don’t have jurisdiction so they can’t act as a law officer (e.g. arrest someone) in a foreign county.

That's a pretty far reaching statement that is wrong in most places. Laws (typically) concerning police are at the state level, and they can act across their state.* Most states also extend jurisdiction to other states' police in specific circumstances. They ALSO extend jurisdiction (which is really sort of a formality because are they actually going to go against the bigger government?) to federal police/agents, typically limited to felonies.

*some exceptions are carved out, like traffic stops and where the arrested are to be transported and by who the arrested will be transported by.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I know that’s not how jurisdiction legally works on paper, but in practice, if ICE can come in and kidnap people off the street at gunpoint and the law enforcement with legal jurisdiction is unwilling to use lethal force to protect their citizens, ICE effectively has jurisdiction. I’d similarly say cartels have effective jurisdiction in parts of Mexico.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You sound like Humpty Dumpty:

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

Using words that far outside their dictionary or conventional meanings is a not a path to clear communication.


Separately, I checked, and I can no longer find the map of ICE jurisdiction that I was remembering, and as far as I can tell ICE's current jurisdiction is anywhere federal law applies, including Oklahoma. So, I was definitely wrong there.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

You sound like Humpty Dumpty

I inferred from context that you meant that because they don’t have jurisdiction, they can’t arrest people. If that inference was wrong, so be it, but it was a reasonable one.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 17 hours ago

If they were following the law and don't have jurisdiction, they can't arrest people. But, (a) this administration doesn't follow the law and (b) they do have jurisdiction. So, whatever I meant, I was clearly wrong. 🤣 😢

[–] III@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I do nazi the point your are trying to make here.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

A Hallmark of a Fascist government is the use of the justice system to shield those who support the government... And target those who do not

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But will it cost his party votes?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He probably gained a few with this.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

From the demographic he's currently attacking no doubt

[–] Azal@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

I'll respond to everyone who asks about votes on this. Southern Strategy.

Anyone with pattern recognition knew it was coming.

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Now he's after African Americans??? WTF! What next Chicago Italians?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I have been wondering this actually. Like is he going to start reclaiming white from different people? Starting with the Italians maybe, probably not Eastern Europeans but you never know, are the Irish going back down? Are they redefining white again?

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Likely the Irish for some reason. It wasn't too long ago that they were considered a "minority" class in this country. In some circles (I'm looking at you, NE America), they were viewed as worse than the Black or Hispanic populations.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

I'm as lily white the sun is my enemy as I can get. Last name is Irish.

I've honestly been wondering if it was going to be Irish or Italians he was after for an "excuse" to crack white liberal areas.

Anyone who thinks they're safe and not a billionaire has their heads up their ass.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I certainly would’ve chosen the creators of deep dish first.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 15 hours ago

What do you have against breaded lasagna?

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man this dude and America in general is a huge fucking quack.

Just like that time he attacked "insert other democratic here" there's probably a group of people in the current demographic that still support him.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

Now, while I said above if you're of any demographic other than billionaire you should be nervous, going after the black crowd I'm kinda actually surprised it took this long.

Look up the Southern Strategy. It's been the Republican MO since LBJ, so racism specifically to the blacks has been baked in to the Republicans to win votes.

It's not that the current demographic would still support him, the current demographic is upset that Jim Crow laws went away.

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

I would expect nothing less from the Orange Nazi.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

From the article

New poll says 3 of 4 Americans believe democracy is at risk

Democracy? US democracy? What democracy?