Programmer Humor

26332 readers

2066 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

252

"You're absolutely right!" (github.com)

submitted 1 month ago by GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I have the confidence level turned down too but lately it doubles down on itself.

The usual conversation....

VI: "You could do this."
Me: "That won't work because XYZ."
VI: "No, you can definitely do that. XYZ has nothing to do with it."
Me: pastes it's own suggestion in.
VI: "Almost, but that won't work because of XYZ."

It's most notorious one is adding an s to Table.AddColumn() then proceeding to make a full snippet around this newly made up function. This specific example is so regular it's become a joke at work for giving someone an unhelp response,

"What do you want to do for lunch today?"

"Have you tried table add columns?"

[–] Brujones@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I got curious about x86 assembly, so I followed some tutorials to get the hang of it. Once I had some confidence, I wrote a prime number generator. I had a loop that I was sure could be more efficient, but couldn't figure it out.

I pasted the code to ChatGPT. It came back with an optimization that wouldn't work because it wasn't preserving critical register values. I pointed that out, and it responded, again and again, with the same code with the same problem. I was never able to get it out of this broken record mode.