this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
804 points (98.2% liked)

Political Memes

9193 readers
2952 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/46305684

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Still hate that we think we don't work enough. There's so much automation anymore, why are we always pressured to feel like we're behind?

Give me 4 - 8s brother, I'm tired.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Mozingo@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I just want the choice. You work 2-4s, they work 4-8s, I want to work 5-5s.

I wonder if instead of retirement age we could just do the gradual reduction of hours. I know I’m at the 5-6s age, but feel like I’m on the cusp of 4-6s. The thing is, my knowledge is more valuable than my labor anymore.

Just today my company tried to move forward on a 200k decision — everyone on board. I came in at 10am. I took an hour to really think through the problem they were trying to solve and came up with a different course of action. I brought it to my boss, forcing them to think about it in a different way. By about 3pm, it had made its way through the C Suite and the original deal was cancelled. They will still spend 200k, but now it will be on the right solution, and they won’t spend another 300k fixing their mistake. I left at 3pm.

I don’t need to be there 40 hours/week to get my job done.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want to work 5-5s

Ia that 0 hour shifts, 12 hour shifts, or 24 hour shifts? 🤔

I think they meant five 5-hour shifts per week.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think we can maintain our standard of living and cut down that much. I think 32 hours is definitely doable, and a huge QoL improvement.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Robots literally stacking boxes in warehouses. Everything is possible already, except getting humans to actually want good for others. We want to build an eternal hell on Earth, devoid of any mercy.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are a lot of people to bring up from much worse shape.

It's possible we could get down to 24-27 hours a week while maintaining our current standard of living and bringing those people up. Some day.

I don't think 16 hours is reasonable. And I think 32 is a more reasonable short/medium term goal.

We absolutely have an obscene amount of wealth the spread, but it spreads really fast. Walmart made 15.5 billion in profit last year. They have 1.6 million employees in the US. If you take 100% of those profits and divide, that comes out to $9500 per employee. Average Walmart employee makes about $36,000 per year. So after some very rough napkin math, the average employee generates an additional 25% of their salary as profit. If you reduce their productivity by 50%, they're no longer profitable. If they're not longer profitable, they're no longer sustaining themselves at the current rate even if the owners take no profits.

We do have a lot of room to make things better. But we still need people to work. We still need people to deal with ~80% of the crap they deal with now. But that 20% still makes a difference, and we should be working towards that instead of away from it.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

why are we always pressured to feel like we’re behind

One reason is because of old Christian morale. You're born in sin and have to work and obey to repent for that sin, idle hands are the devil's workshop, that kind of stuff. Of course this kind of mentality got co-opted by industrial society to the point that work forms somebody's entire status in society and obligation to the nation. Industry then does what it does best and mercilessly exploits this.

A second reason is because the entire monetary system and economy is built on growth. There always needs to be more goods, more services, more consumption. And if the population isn't growing enough, then the people have to be made to buy more.

What brings us to advertisements, pushing to spend more, to compare yourself with the neighbors, always evaluating the status you're projecting.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

nah it's capitalism. endless growth requires every advancement to be the bare minimum.

oh the best we've ever produced was 40 units in a year but this year we managed to produce 60 units? well next year we gotta produce at least 90 units or we will have slowed down.

no, the profit we made from the extra 20 won't be reflected on your paycheck because the shareholders and/or your boss would literally go hungry if they don't horde all of it.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Hands that burn down churches are not idle at all.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The problem is consumables. This photo appears to be an oil worker.

The US burns something on the order of 20 million barrels of oil a day(!)

https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=33&t=6

Up from 19 million not too long ago. 100 million in a work week. 5.2 billion a year.

Someone needs to be out there producing it. Yeah, it would be great if we could wean ourselves off of it, but then we'd still need people producing and managing whatever replaces it.

[–] bollybing@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bicycles. Very little oil required.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Oil is used in a lot more than just transportation.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone -1 points 1 day ago

there being enough food to feed the world probably doesn’t mean you work less: people outside the imperial core often work far more for far less… if we even out those scales, i reckon we’d probably end up working more; not less!

yeah billionaires are a thing, but distribute the top 10 billionaires’ wealth across the US population and that’s still only about $1000 each… the top 20 to the world and everyone still only gets about $100USD

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 days ago

I do not want 14 hour shifts starting at 4. 9 - 5s are bad enough.