this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
105 points (93.4% liked)
Canada
10345 readers
746 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au Québec
- Maple Music (music)
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The vehicles it should be producing are electric bicycles.
And very fast trains.
We don't really have places to put them domestically, until we do a buttload of complicated and expensive land acquisition, and I wouldn't want to try and sell HSR abroad built in a country that doesn't really have much.
I'm sorry but I just don't buy that. Canada built its original rail system coast to coast in the 19th century with a population of 4 million and a highway coast to coast in the 60's with a population of 20 million. We can make HSR happen today with a population of 40 million. We just need some vision.
Do I really need to mention who was in the path of the original railway? That being said, a single, coast-to-coast line actually does make sense, and is one of those projects under serious consideration at the federal level. But, it's going to compete with airlines, not cars. If you want to go from Regina to Saskatoon or Calgary to Drumheller neither that nor an ebike are going to help.
Have a look at just about any public works project around and how they go, if you actually interested in or care about this. You're going to have to demolish homes and restructure communities along the way. It can be done, and it has, but it's slow and terrible, and a lot of people will hate it. I would assume the trans-Canada highway reused a lot of existing road and still was like that.
Vancouver area is expanding the skytrain, its not HSR, but it will make the 60km commute a breeze. And my one coworker drives 5 hours from his residence to Vancouver area every few weeks. So a rail route would compete with a car. There is a plane route, but with getting to airport, security and waiting or delays, driving is a more pleasant option.
We could build two right now - one in Ontario and one in Alberta (parallel to QEII) - on existing land grants. Instead, we just keep making the highways wider.
Yes, it still is a good idea to do some. The QEII plan looks like it would be crammed in there pretty tight, but it's worth it; then again, our current government is crazy and likes to blow up projects already underway because their cousin would have a view ruined, or whatever.
Switching overnight from building cars to rail stock is quite something else.
I was in Calgary or Edmonton, I forget it was a work trip blur. The train was right down the middle of the road. You could reach out your car window and touch it. If you want something there are ways to make it fit
At high speed, you're not going to run a track streetcar style. Safety and strong gusts to the surrounding area aside, they have really shit turn radius. (Edit: Like, kilometers)
IIRC the QEII line would be raised in the margin between the two traffic directions. The stations would be trickier, and I'm not sure if a solid plan even exists, although, yes, it can be done somewhere somehow. And come to think of it, I'm not sure how they're planning to run it through the existing overpasses, either.
It doesn't even have to be highspeed, anything is faster than bumper to bumper traffic
and compact vehicles, both electric and combustion. but compact.
sometimes a car is required. make it economical and inoffensive so that people have a choice and can rightfully be held accountable when they buy a massive brand new Highlander to transport their groceries and newborn while endangering literally everybody else, and themselves, by driving a massive heavy object that blinds everybody in front of it
and stop making roads bigger, that just encourages more people to drive