this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
1425 points (98.2% liked)

pics

24447 readers
1620 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The only good landlord is a former landlord.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

I have a pretty good landlord. This isn't an ACAB situation. The problem is the market, IMO, if not capitalism entirely; even if you got rid of landlords (made it illegal to have tenants), housing prices would still be too high to buy a house. Supply-side or demand-side economics are the only viable solution under capitalism.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

Blaming the landlord is more of a meme. Don't take it seriously

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, and there will always be a demand for temporary housing. Even if every person has property, tourists need places to stay, you'd need a place to stay if your house is leveled by a natural disaster, it doesn't make sense to jump through all the hoops of property ownership if you just want to be closer to mom's nursing home in her final months, etc.

The problem isn't filling that need, it's making a profit off it.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

under capitalism, almost nothing happens without a profit. If you're so sure the problem isn't capitalism, please explain to me how exactly you're imagining things should work.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how you got 'this person is pro-capitalism' from me saying 'profit is the problem'.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I said:

The problem is the market, IMO, if not capitalism entirely

but it seemed to me that you were disagreeing with my post when you said "the problem is making a profit off it." I could have misunderstood, and you were agreeing?

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You think capitalism is the problem, yes? If so, we are in agreement.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

yes. Capitalism is the problem, not landlords per se. Under capitalism, I feel like it is more ethical to rent out a spare room in one's house than it is to not rent it out.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago

We could still have great property managers without landlords. Then you wouldn't even need to be thankful that your lord happens to be one of the benevolent ones.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

..no, that's just what I said is not the case. You must have misread?

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Looking at the instances you two are from I feel like I'm taking crazy pills 🫨

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 3 points 15 hours ago

Sorry, I forgot to tell you that today is opposite day.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You sound like a slave complimenting his owner for being such a kind-hearted masser who treats him good

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

oh that's so sweet, you think i'm naïve <3