this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
235 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

51358 readers
421 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Installing jellyfin is as easy as setting up any self hosted thing though... Just use docker compose if you want simplicity.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And secure remote access for me and my friends and family?

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wireguard is also very simple to setup. This would allow you to share other services you host in the future in a secure way as well.

[–] bagodogs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your mom's Tizen TV doesn't have a Wireguard or Tailscale client, so you're going to be the person configuring her router, or setting up a Pi or something, as well as now being the designated tech support.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its not hard to setup a proxy and use a full SSL cert. A little bit more complex but much simpler for the rest of the family.

[–] bagodogs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You suggested Wireguard, not me. I'm pointing out how it isn't a great solution to the problem that was presented; you can safely access it remotely with a VPN, but then that isn't very useful for sharing with others, and you can expose the service to the internet at large, but then you're opening yourself to risk.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 19 hours ago

Yes that's why I suggested a alternative. Although wireguard is simpler to setup initially. Using proxy's and exposing your service directly is simpler for the end user. Both are not difficult to do.