this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
56 points (95.2% liked)

Canada

10430 readers
954 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the Liberals have shifted rightward—not just on immigration but also on military spending, climate policy, and public safety—the federal Conservative leader appears to have gone looking for an issue on which to distinguish himself. He is now signalling that scapegoating immigrants and people seeking asylum will be central to that plan.

Poilievre’s allies in think tanks, lobby firms, and the media think he’s found a winning strategy. In the wake of Poilievre’s defeat in the last election, former Conservative staffer Josie Sabatino described it as a “new era” in which Poilievre can “move beyond the risk-averse messaging of a campaign.” National Post columnist Geoff Russ called it “a once-in-a-generation opportunity to finally turn immigration into an issue our politicians can openly and honestly debate.” Conservative activist Amy Hamm declared that the days of labelling Conservatives as racist for their views on immigration have passed.

Anti-immigrant sentiments will only grow the more immigrants are falsely blamed for problems in housing, health care and unemployment—all of which are better explained by the policies of austerity-loving politicians and the corporate class. None of these dynamics are new in Canada, but they are likely to grow with more oxygen from federal Conservatives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I honestly can't see how people defend the TFW program. It artificially suppresses wages of low-income Canadians and pads the pockets of large corporations.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Or just how inhumane it is for the workers.

Immigration in general is a right wing thing anyway. It’s why the US has so much and as Canada has continued to pivot right wing we’ve seen increases.

The left’s problem isn’t that they want immigrants, it’s that they want foreigners here and abroad to be treated and respected as people.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I honestly can't see how people defend the TFW program

How it was originally intended (for attracting specialized skill professionals who are not available in the local economy) is defensible, but what it has been expanded to become and how far too many employers abuse it is not defensible.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For sure - I know the original intention was to try and bring in specialized workers we don't have here. But IMO, that encourages wage suppression and hiring from outside rather than training.

Its a useful stopgap tool, but it always should have had a requirement of training an alternate candidate or showing some other longterm solution beyond permanent use of the TFW program.

And, like you said, definitely not intended for its use the way it has been now.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

it always should have had a requirement of training an alternate candidate or showing some other longterm solution

Requiring the hiring of 1 trainee/apprentice type position locally for every TFW hired could be a helpful return to the original intent.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Sooo we needed a million e-bike delivery people living 12 to a room in Brampton to keep the economy afloat? What’s skilled about that?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A programme that keeps our economy going by people who will not later become a cost to it

Yeah, who needs it.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Right, but if were keeping our economy going solely on the basis of (generally) cheap imported labour, that's going to come back to bite us in the ass unless the govt comes up with a plan to actually alleviate the labour shortage.

IMO, they haven't, so there's a serious problem.

I don't doubt the TFW has a place, particularly as a stop gap, but there should be additional requirements for those positions, such as requiring an apprenticeship/entry level position to match their requirements, or some other long term planning.