this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1195 readers
44 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So seeing the reaction on lesswrong to Eliezer's book has been interesting. It turns out, even among people that already mostly agree with him, a lot of them were hoping he would make their case better than he has (either because they aren't as convinced as him, or they are, but were hoping for something more palatable to the general public).

This review (lesswrong discussion here), calls out a really obvious issue: Eliezer's AI doom story was formed before Deep Learning took off, and in fact was mostly focusing on more GOFAI than neural networks, yet somehow, the details of the story haven't changed at all. The reviewer is a rationalist that still believes in AI doom, so I wouldn't give her too much credit, but she does note this is a major discrepancy from someone that espouses a philosophy that (nominally) features a lot of updating your beliefs in response to evidence. The reviewer also notes that "it should be illegal to own more than eight of the most powerful GPUs available in 2024 without international monitoring" is kind of unworkable.

This reviewer liked the book more than they expected to, because Eliezer and Nate Soares gets some details of the AI doom lore closer to the reviewer's current favored headcanon. The reviewer does complain that maybe weird and condescending parables aren't the best outreach strategy!

This reviewer has written their own AI doom explainer which they think is better! From their limited description, I kind of agree, because it sounds like the focus on current real world scenarios and harms (and extrapolate them to doom). But again, I wouldn't give them too much credit, it sounds like they don't understand why existential doom is actually promoted (as a distraction and source of crit-hype). They also note the 8 GPUs thing is batshit.

Overall, it sounds like lesswrongers view the book as an improvement to the sprawling mess of arguments in the sequences (and scattered across other places like Arbital), but still not as well structured as they could be or stylistically quite right for a normy audience (i.e. the condescending parables and diversions into unrelated science-y topics). And some are worried that Nate and Eliezer's focus on an unworkable strategy (shut it all down, 8 GPU max!) with no intermediate steps or goals or options might not be the best.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm still not sure if they actually grasp the totalitarian implications of going ham on tech companies and research this way. He sure doesn't get called out about his 'solutions' that imply that some sort of world government has to happen that will also crown him Grand Central Planner of All Technology.

It's possible they just believe the eight [specific consumer electronic goods] per household is doable, and at worst equally authoritarian with the tenured elites snubbing their noses at HBD research.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You thought a right-and-proper Communist Five-Year Plan couldn't also be a self-insert fanfic? Hold Yud's beer

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

did you hear about Yudoslavia? They have this Eight GPU policy, if a household is about to have another GPU and they find it can’t run Crysis at max settings at 60fps, they leave it outside for the wolves. But this might just be Yudophobic propaganda

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

In Eliezer's "utopian" worldbuilding fiction concept, dath ilan, they erased their entire history just to cover up the any mention of any concept that might inspire someone to think of "superintelligence" (and as an added bonus purge other wrong-think concepts). The ~~Philosopher Kings~~ Keepers have also discouraged investment and improvement in computers (because somehow, despite now holding any direct power and the massive financial incentives and dath ilan being described as capitalist and libertarian, the Keepers can just sort of say their internal secret prediction market predicts bad vibes from improving computers too much and everyone falls in line). According to several worldbuiding posts, dath ilan has built an entire secret city that gets funded with 2% of the entire world's GDP to solve AI safety in utter secrecy.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In my ideal version of Omelas there's a secret institution where people like me are given vast power and wealth to think about how to solve the tortured child issue.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In Eliezer’s “utopian” worldbuilding fiction concept, dath ilan

In Eliezer's sweet fucking what now?

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would be only light cringey if he kept it as a fiction writing project not strongly linked to his other writings. But as Architeuthis says, he not only links to it frequently, he cites it like it was a philosophy paper or something that obviously everyone should have read. Example from our old reddit discussions: https://www.reddit.com/r/SneerClub/comments/x3pihv/to_be_fair_you_have_to_have_a_very_high_iq_to/

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

There are probably some downright horrifying things in Yud's dath-ilangations, but I bounce off the format every time I try to read it, so I won't be the one to find them. I am OK with this.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there any place where I could find out wth this is but passed through a sneer filter already?

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We've sneered about dath ilan before on the reddit sneerclub, and occasionally I work references to dath ilan's lore into sneers, but other than that no.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My current iteration of the etymology is that "dath ilani" anagrams to "HD Italian". As in, the dath ilani are an idealised version of Italians, making dath ilan a utopian version of Italy.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, these days you can't even post a recipe without a dath ilani guy getting mad in the comments

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 3 points 3 hours ago

Breaking spaghetti in 720p to piss off HD Italians.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That he cites as if it were a philosophy paper, to non-rationalists.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

tell me you didn't subject yourself to glowfic

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Where else am I supposed to fine deep analyses of the economic implications of 1st level wizards and clerics on an early modern setting? ~~and analyses of Intelligence score distributions across the nations of Golarion?~~

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

glowfic: it's like a forum, but worse(tm)

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

Glowfic sounds like fan fiction written by CIA agents.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep, from what I can tell second hand dath ilan world building definitely skews towards it doesn't count as totalitarianism if the enforced orthodoxy is in line with my Obviously Objectively Correct and Overdetermined opinions.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It is funny that this is the best Yud, with an IQ of 191, can come up with.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thanks for the lore, and sorry that you had to ingest all that at some point.

Like a lot of sci-fi that I will comment on without having read, that sounds like a Dune ripoff (that I also have not read). Except, rather than "ok we tried the whole AI thing and it turned out bad", Yud is saying "my world is smarter because they predicted AI would be bad, so they just didn't try it, neener neener neener!"

Also, iterating on the name origins of "dath ilan," as I've said before, it's an anagram of Thailand. But I have a new hypothesis. It's formed from "Death Island" minus the letters "ESD". What could this mean?!?!?! Electrostatic discharge? "Eek, Small Dragon?" "Eliezer Sudden Death?" The abyss pondering continues...

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

OG Dune actually had some complex and layered stuff to say about AI before the background lore was retconned to dollar store WH40K by the current handlers of the IP.

There was no superintelligence, thinking machines were gatekept by specialists who formed entrenched elites, overreliance to them was causing widespread intellectual stagnation, and people were becoming content with letting unknowable algorithms decide on matters of life and death.

The Butlerian Jihad was first and foremost a cultural revolution.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was very much a Luddite movement that succeeded

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean the aftermath of Buterlian Jihad eventually lead to brutal feudalism that lasted a really long time and halted multiple lines of technological and social development, so I wouldn't exactly call it a success for the common person.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Well, at least they got to find out exactly how far extreme mental discipline (and space psychedelics) could take you. You got mentats, truth sayers, suk doctors and so on and so forth. Not that the vast majority of the population ever got to see any benefit from them, because hey, feudalism, and they themselves were basically luxury slaves to the Great Houses, but it's not nothing I guess.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn't there a bit in the OG Dune lore where the person the Jihad was named after actually didn't want to start a Jihad? (I think that was retconned into 'they sneakily did try to become a martyr to start the war' bit, which sort of messes with the themes of Dune that even lofty goals can have horrible consequences, see Paul).

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The author certainly wants you to know that finding yourself as the head of a revolutionary movement means very little with regards to your abilities to steer it, but I don't remember.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah I recalled that was part of Frank Herberts thinking, but when I looked at a description of the books written by his son together with Kevin J. Anderson (of course (I read several of his saga of the seven suns books and I was not impressed with his 'elemental aliens' bit, but I in general have something against 'the 4 elements stories' as usually this isn't that interesting as a plot device (avatar was great otoh). I did enjoy his star wars comics however. So I prob should give them another try esp as the series is now done)), and according to that Butler planned to be martyred and to intensify the war, so that is a bit of a different take on the revolutionary leader idea.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Please don't bother with the KJA/BH Dune books, they are incredibly shit. It's basically Dune fanfiction where the gimmick is everyone is brain damaged, especially the authors.

And even if you are into that, if you read the prequels first they will retroactively ruin the original books by giving up plot reveals for fanservice, or because they don't understand that character development is a thing, so you get people behaving like a lot of things that don't happen for several books are a given.

KJA is such a hack's hack it's unbelievable that he's flown under the radar the way he has, probably because he's made a career out of leeching on existing ips, before Dune it was starwars, x-files and stracraft, at least.

He sucks, and very consistently so. People should be writing Renowned author Dan Brown pieces about him.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Yeah meant the seven suns series. Dune I need to get into the sequels first. (Think i might have read them decades ago). But yes the seven suns def had me persistent in reading out of a sort of spite and fools hope.

And after the horus heresy, im not sure I want another prequel, and rereading those is not an option.

And on a lol note, my parents got the newest Brown for themselves. The article about brown reminded me of the crash investigator book by Dan Simmons, shared a few of Browns writing flaws.

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Thanks for the lore, and sorry that you had to ingest all that at some point.

Ironically, one of the biggest lore drops about dath ilan happens in a story I initially thought at the time was a parody of rationalists and the concept of dath ilan (Eliezer used a new penname for the story). The main dath ilan character (isekai'd into an Earth mostly similar to our own but with magic and uh.. other worldbuilding conceits I won't get into here) jumps to absurd wild conclusion throughout basically every moment of the story, and unlike HJPEV is actually wrong about basically every conclusion she jumps to. Of course, she's a woman, and it comes up towards the ending that she is below average for dath ilan intelligence (but still above the Earth average, obviously), so don't give Eliezer too much credit for allowing a rationalist character to be mostly wrong for once.

I don't know how he came up with the name... other fanfic writers in rationalist-adjacent space have complained about his amateurish attempts at conlanging, so there probably isn't a sophisticated conlang explanation about phonemes involved. You might be on the right track guessing at weird anagrams?

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago

other fanfic writers in rationalist-adjacent space have complained about his amateurish attempts at conlanging

that feeling when the chess club shoves you into a locker

[–] istewart@awful.systems 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

other worldbuilding conceits I won’t get into here

My invite-only internal prediction market is offering good odds that this is referring to either math pets or tentacles, and a solid parlay opportunity on it being both combined

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

You are close! It is a bdsm AU (inspired by an Archive of Our Own Trend of writing alternate universe settings of a particular flavor), i.e. everyone identifies as "Dominant" or "Submissive", and that identification is more important than gender in most ways. Ironically the dath ilan character is the one freaked out by this.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I can smell the 'rape (play) is the best kind of sex actually' from over here.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 2 days ago

(Eliezer used a new penname for the story).

Stop trying to make dath ilan happen, Yud.

HJPEV

I didn’t what this meant initially. “HJP” pointed me toward “harry james potter” but I couldn’t figure out “EV,” so ofc my gutter brain decided this was “Handjob Penis Envy Vagina”. But no, it’s just “HJP Evans Verres”, Verres being HJPEV’s adopted dad.

so don’t give Eliezer too much credit

He has a credit score of 250 from this (imagine me holding two thumbs up at myself) ratings agency.

I don’t know how he came up with the name

Yeah his naming is wack. I’m guessing that Yud went with “Verres” for HJP’s nonbiodad because it’s close to “veritas”, the latin word for truth. But searching “verres” gives the latin word for boar, lol. And also Gaius Verres, a notoriously bad magistrate according to wikipedia.