this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
912 points (99.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

14003 readers
339 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jason Bassler | @JasonBassler1

Big Brother just got an upgrade.

Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored, tagged, & analyzed without consent.

One step closer to total surveillance.

[Image: A Ring doorbell camera mounted on a brick wall. A digital overlay shows facial recognition scanning a person's face with grid lines. Text on the right reads "Amazon's Ring Adds Facial Recognition to Home Security" with additional text below.]

6:00 PM | Oct 4, 2025

Source: https://x.com/JasonBassler1/status/1974640686419857516

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Same here. All private cameras that record or process data from a public space need to be announced on entrance of a property. Though now that i think about it, idk how ring got passed that law to begin with in 99% of its use cases..

( if its a front door that can only view private property its fine iirc, and if it has public space like roads its a nono )

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Same as non-legal ebikes perhaps? Where I live the police don't seem to care unless the rider happens to be a drug dealer or otherwise wanted by the police.

I'd take a guess that while a ring doorbell might be illegal and not enforced, it probably means the recorded footage might be not accepted in court if ever needed... Perhaps (I'm not a lawyer or even close to being an expert). Unless a doorbell inspector becomes a thing then it probably just slides.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

idk how ring got passed that law to begin with in 99% of its use cases

It doesn't comply... but the responsibility falls on the person who mounts/uses the hardware, so Amazon does whatever they want.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right, so i could in theory start sueing. Nice haha