this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
83 points (98.8% liked)

Videos

167 readers
22 users here now

Share

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

1 sure looks like him activating a shock collar because he doesn't want her allowed to do anything other than sit in one designated spot while he's doing his stream

2 is self-explanatory

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Yeah. The behavior of people in this comments section really blows my mind. Just listening to the guy talk about his dog, or watching them interact, it is very clear that he's a POS. Also, the whole thing of "she's the most spoiled dog in the world" and how angry he is about that, instead of something like "and she deserves it because she is the best" or something, is so disgusting. Bro why the fuck do you even have a dog. Just get a little statue to be in frame for you on the platform, and let this dog go live its life away from your stress inducing stream.

I think it for real is very similar to MAGA. The whole concept of watching the video and coming to their own conclusion is alien to them. They need a tribe to be part of, and so anything bad someone says about the tribe needs somebody to motivate to say some stuff in defense. They're barely paying attention to the evidence, just trying to figure out how to muster the best counterpoint they can about whatever it is they've decided in advance is "the right side."

[–] enbipanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've yet to see anyone "out of their fucking minds" despite you saying it.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

I realized something interesting: Sometime yesterday, the almost unanimous majority of the pro-Hasan commenters shifted over into accusing people of being fans of some other streamer who I have barely heard of, or of being taken in by random streamer drama. They're all pretty familiar with streamer drama and all of the personalities at work in this weird little space.

That means that more or less every single one of the normies who just happened to run across this clip without being deep into streamer lore, had the same logical horrified reaction to it. The only people defending Hasan (with maybe like 1-2 exceptions, people who watched the clip and decided it didn't look like a big deal to them) are people with some kind of parasocial thing going on, who are assuming that everyone else in the thread obviously has some alternate parasocial thing going on also.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As he has said in previous streams, he doesn't care about the health of dogs because "they're just dogs". He has admitted to owning a shock collar and blamed his dog for being too fat when a guest on his stream pointed out that his dog's collar was way too tight. There are so many red flags against this dude, it is incredibly obvious to anyone who isn't a psychopath that this is a bad dog owner.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

He has admitted to owning a shock collar

I mean, what he said was that his roommate owned a shock collar, and that he was against them. It was a little unclear to me but it didn't exactly sound like he was admitting much of anything in that clip (if the one you have in mind is also the one I'm thinking of).

Twitter is now saying they figured out what collar he has, and that it's the shock version of it that he took the prongs out of and then put black tape on the back of the box, and that's why he was so incredibly hesitant to show it for more than 0.2 seconds or move his hand away from that weird sort of cardshark grip he had the collar in the entire time. I thought about making a separate post with the quick overview video which is all I've seen so far, but I'm honestly mostly done with dealing with this shit at least for tonight and I don't really want to post it and start another kerfuffle until I can look at the details a decent amount myself. Here's that video though (with some irritatingly quick scrolls through a document which lays out some of the details, you'll have to pause to really be able to see anything, but it does make sense if you pause it and look):

https://files.catbox.moe/x0kbh4.mp4

And yes, I agree. The main thing that makes me think he's a POS is his overall tone and emotional affect, and the dog's reactions to him. If she just yelped on stream right after he reached for something, but then his overall way of interacting with her was normal and caring instead of exactly the opposite of that, then I probably wouldn't think twice about it.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, what he said was that his roommate owned a shock collar, and that he was against them. It was a little unclear to me but it didn’t exactly sound like he was admitting much of anything in that clip (if the one you have in mind is also the one I’m thinking of).

He says he bought it and still has it (at the time of the stream that was clipped from). He also said they're incredibly effective. By itself that video doesn't mean much, but there seems to be a consistent trail of evidence against the guy, certainly enough that no sane person would immediately dismiss the concerns.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe. Like I said, the overall body language from the dog, and his tone of voice when he talks about her, and also him lying about objectively verifiable things, mean more to me on the topic than a lot of these clips that people are talking about.

(For example, the fact that back then he was saying that shock collars are mean and he doesn't believe in them, and he's bringing that up now as a defense of himself, but then saying simultaneously that shock collars don't even hurt anyway so even if she was wearing one it wouldn't be a big deal. That's... well, you know.)

But anyway, like I say, I have never seen someone's dog who is less happy to interact with them. She just seems defeated. She doesn't lick him, she doesn't perk up when he pays attention to her, she just sits there quietly while he's rubbing her head or whatever, and then slowly obeys his commands to come here or go sit on her bed or whatever, with her head down. I realize that's subjective but that is definitely my take on it.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

Unless you've watched a lot of his streams, that feels like a pretty big stretch. There could be so many reasons why the dog was behaving in that manner, but there is no excuse for not checking on it when you think it's in pain.

[–] RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You have no credibility and no evidence

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Did Hasan teach you this trick, of just repeating over and over again the same statement (after someone provides a video of the abuse, has a lengthy discussion about the plausibility of theories like "it's a GPS collar" and goes through individual frames to show what they're talking about or timelapses of a longer amount of the stream), as if whoever simply refuses to shut up for the longest automatically wins the disagreement? Obviously you're not trying to make a factual point, since this whole thread is basically me providing evidence. I think the thing you are trying to do doesn't really work in a format like this, I'm sure it is better if you can say "You have no credibility and no evidence. Goodbye." and then kick the person from your stream or something, but that's not what we are doing.

I honestly don't have much more to say. Like I said, I thought about showing some of the freeze frames blown up from the video, showing that she definitely didn't catch her dewclaw on the metal bar next to her for example, but what would be the point. Anyone who cares enough can put the clip through mpv and see it for themselves (and being able to watch in context and flip around is better than the freeze frames anyway). Honestly as a broader point if you don't have the emotional intelligence to see what is clearly present in Hasan's and Kaya's behavior just in the original clips, I don't know what to tell you, and I don't really feel like you and me talking further to each other about it is productive in any way at this point.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

after someone provides a video of the abuse, has a lengthy discussion about the plausibility of theories like "it's a GPS collar" and goes through individual frames to show what they're talking about or timelapses of a longer amount of the stream

This is an awful lot of effort for someone to go to just to convince me of how i should feel about a political commentator interacting with his dog.

As soon as you stop yourself to ask "is this really worth thinking this hard about," it becomes pretty clear that you're talking to someone a little too invested with the life of this public figure.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I care about what is true and often I want to dig to the bottom of it.

You could say it's not a good way to be, and depending on the triviality of the subject matter you might be right. But I definitely don't think it's the worst thing in the world to have that mindset.

Also, just because everyone talked to me about Ethan Klein and he showed up in my YouTube anyway, I am now watching him for the first time, talking about this controversy.

Edit: WHAT THE FUCK HAVE I DONE now half my YouTube recommendations is streamer bullshit

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The topics and people we choose to spend time and effort on speak quite a bit about what matters to us. It means something that this story captured this much of your attention, it isn't neutral truth seeking.

I dont think it's healthy to be this invested in a stranger's relationship with their dog. That it involves a public figure you've had strong reactions to before makes me think this is just parasocial indulgence.

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Fyi, this is called concern trolling.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Oh the old reddit switcheroo, nice!

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Didn't you just post a bunch of pure bullying videos about Ethan Kline?

I tried to watch Ethan Kline today for the first time, and it was too much bullshit for me to even want to be a part of for more than a few minutes. The man looks like a sickly Victorian orphan. A video about Ethan Kline and what a big poopy head he is, is not something I would ever consider watching let along posting. I tried to watch your video and all I can say is, I don't think you should be giving advice to anyone along this particular axis.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

Watching a video passively is one thing, it's another thing to do all this:

!after someone provides a video of the abuse, has a lengthy discussion about the plausibility of theories like "it's a GPS collar" and goes through individual frames to show what they're talking about or timelapses of a longer amount of the stream!<

Ultimately idgaf, im just telling you what it looks like to see someone go to this amount of trouble, especially for a public figure they've already shown distaste for, and especially since you've also previously elaborated at length about how you think about your contributions to online spaces through a political lense.

[–] RenLinwood@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

You still have no credibility and no evidence