Not The Onion

18302 readers

1540 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

642

Trump classifies “anti-capitalism” as a political pre-crime (jacobin.com)

submitted 2 days ago by MHLoppy@fedia.io to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Donald Trump’s new security directive labels anti-capitalist beliefs as a predictor of political violence. The irony: left-wing structural analysis actually pushes people away from lone-wolf attacks and toward mass organizing for change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There's a fundamental contradiction in the definition of a free market. To some, it means a competitive market. To some, it means an unregulated market. But there can be no competitive market without regulation: without regulation, it almost immediately degenerates into oligopoly and anticompetitive market-rigging among the players. Businesses hate nothing more than they hate competition.

That great cheerleader of capitalism Adam Smith (the original guy, not the twat using his name now) knew that.

"People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices."

That's from his classic work, The Wealth of Nations.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Exactly, if the demand isn't/can't be flexible (eg healthcare, housing) then no matter the amount of competition on the supply side will balance things out in an unregulated market in the long term.

Everyone with the freedom of choice is on the supply side, and everyone on that side benefits from higher prices.
And there is no other metric of success other than profit.
(Nobody has the incentive to undercut the competition unless for later monopoly reasons. But the same manoeuvre can be achieved cheaper via mergers without the loss of revenue due to lower margins.)

That's why healthcare was a problem (with a constantly giant inflation) in the USA even before all the consolidations.