this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
583 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

18302 readers
1552 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s new security directive labels anti-capitalist beliefs as a predictor of political violence. The irony: left-wing structural analysis actually pushes people away from lone-wolf attacks and toward mass organizing for change.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] etherphon@midwest.social 10 points 7 hours ago

The crime is coming from inside the House.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I really hope we can reach a point where we don't give this guy headlines.

"Trump declares that anybody that's EVER made fun of him is currently being targeted by every international police force which he has command over, and also that the sky is purple" is a statement totally disconnected from reality. We DO NOT NEED an "Um, actually!" to disprove him.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

New eyewitness photos, surreptitiously captured from inside The White House:

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's funny because Trump isn't a capitalist. In an open market, his businesses fail. He needs government interferencey China style.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Capitalism =/= free market

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

And former eastern block =/= communism.

I obviously used the mainstream meaning of that word.

Fact is, Trump opposes free market capitalism because he's a terrible business man.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

I remember running around twenty years ago asking people (generally educated successful people) how they define capitalism.

Most people are not 100% sure, so they usually guess some form of market and blend it with consumerism.

My guess is that most of this came from Mikhail Gorbachev advertising for Pizza Hut.

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 8 points 23 hours ago

That's a very narrow definition of capitalism. If free markets hinder the main function of the capitalist system (accumulating capital at the top), it will be eroded and abolished. Monopolies for example are much more profitable than competetive situations. Getting rid of or circumventing open market competition is always good business.

Are we starting to use the word "capitalist" the way the Nazis or Soviets used the word "socialist?" As a meaningless label for "the dictator's side?"

[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every day I hope he gets Julius Caesar'd. Every day... disappointment.

[–] jedibob5@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm hoping for natural causes, tbh. If he's actually killed I don't even want to think about how much insane wanton violence the hardcore MAGA wing will commit in response.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Loooooong bout with locked-in syndrome. 🤞🤞

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 167 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] RabiesD@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This makes me think of the of the right wingers calling themselves deplorable or terrorists in response to being labeled as such.

Let's not own up to their labels, let's reject everything they have to say rather than amplify their messaging.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 19 hours ago

You make a decent point.

However, when I made this, my thought process was that they are arresting people for using their first amendment rights while peacefully protesting. Now, the regime is planning to arrest people for "pre-crime". People will absolutely be arrested and charged as a domestic terrorist on the basis that they don't like fascism (Antifa). It's a lot like how they labeled people dangerous subversive communists during the second red scare.

But also, I think it's preferable to litterally do crime against a fascist state then to comply.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Conservatives: "why not both."

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 106 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Since when is there even such a thing as a "political crime", let alone any kind of "pre-crime"?

You can't criminalize someone's political beliefs, unless you're talking about making "thought crimes" a thing. And last time I checked "pre-crime" implies you haven't actually committed any crimes yet...which makes you not actually guilty of anything.

This whole fucking premise is based on stupidity.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago

Tell that to the Communist Control Act of 1954.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

This whole fucking premise is based on ~~stupidity~~ control and power.

FTFY

See, if it were based on stupidity, that would imply these measures are based on good faith efforts to solve a real problem.

What we have here is fabricated issues being "solved" with measures that don't need to make sense. They just need it to give them more power, more control. It doesn't matter if they look "stupid". They aren't acting in good faith to begin with.

[–] Coopr8@kbin.earth 25 points 1 day ago

This is the entire goal of Palantir, presictive policing using mass surveillance data on citizens. Tie in digital ID and you have an even worse version of the CCP's Social Credit system.

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just wait until the dream police come, get jailed for dream crimes.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You joke, but my wife gets mad at me for stuff I did in HER dreams, sometimes. The injustice is real.

[–] itsworkthatwedo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Omg for real. To be fair, I'm a huge prick in her dreams.

My partner has face blindness, mine is one of a handful of faces that she recognizes on their own because I have a facial feature that's distinctive enough that she recognizes it. So I am a frequent character in her dreams. Luckily she's not the type to get mad at me for something I did in her dreams.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Okay, now it's Nineteen Eighty-Four. With hints of Minority Report, Fahrenheit 451, Brazil, and our old friend Idiocracy, of course.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I used to scoff at the comparison to Idiocracy but at this point I'd actually prefer that timeline.

[–] PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

President Camacho cared about his people, recognized problems, and deferred to the knowledge of people he openly admitted were smarter than him to fix them.

I would much prefer a Camacho over a Trump right about now.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 hours ago

Where's that venn diagram with all these, and "you are here" in the middle?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"don"'t build the torment nexus"

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hereby characterize MAGA as early dementia.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not that early.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"classifies" as a crime?

What does that even mean?

He isn't a lawmaker.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Basically providing a framework for who law enforcement should investigate as "suspicious"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Just wait till he learns Ben Franklin socialized Fire Departments

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol, okay, to enforce that, they'd need to spend hundreds of billions on new prisons and police--oh.

He looks up to Russia. I heard the literally imprisoned half the country because they were such dicks. ( exaggeration, but you get what I mean.)

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

What did I even just read? Is it a crime to budget or something?

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago

Thought crime is here.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago

Beat down your local magats for subjecting us all to this

[–] dotslashme@infosec.pub 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

anti-Christianity

Alrighty, but you realize this applies to all your supporters, your cabinet members, all your sycophantic gun waiving morons right? RIGHT!?!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Hurr durr not real Christians 🙄

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

This guy realises fuck all. His brain is mush, and his body is so fucked that he's glad when he only shits himself 7 times in a day.

The disgusting orange turd is only alive through the power of his hatred for everyone and everything. He's going down fast and he's destroying as much of it as he can while he can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"support for the overthrow of the United States Government," is also one pre-crime per that report. That's reflection right there.

So Marx and Trotsky seemed to be against individual murdering of factory owners et alia. Does that imply that they would've been against the atrocities of Communist states that were perpetrated in their name, or would that have been fine because it was done by the masses in some sense?

Neither saw it happen in great numbers: Marx died before any of his ideas manifested properly, and Trotsky of course was murdered by Stalin in 1940. Holodomor and Soviet Union purges had happened already at that point, but perhaps Trotsky might've thought that those were just the evil of Stalin instead of being a more general mistake of his whole ideology. People tend to think that their political philosophy cannot do bad things.

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

"support for the overthrow of the United States Government,"

Ahh the crime he tried to commit a few years back. Can't have anyone else ever try the same thing.

[–] hosford42@techhub.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@MHLoppy Here come the thought police...

[–] hosford42@techhub.social 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

@MHLoppy I can't believe we are doing this all over again. I thought we were done with the "red scare" generations ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what a great article! a breath of fresh air and I suspect that in writing it, the author just added themselves to a list....

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh, comrade Ben Burgis has probably been on a list long before MAGA came to power.

load more comments
view more: next ›